"General Schvantzkoph" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news

(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:44:26 +0000, Doug Kanter wrote:
>
> >
> > "General Schvantzkoph" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news
(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:34:39 +0000, Doug Kanter wrote:
> >>
> >> > This is a saga! I have a Sony Vaio PCG-FX215 notebook computer that
came
> >> > with 128mb of RAM. The machine came with Windows ME, but a year ago,
I
> >> > reformatted the HD and installed XP Pro. A month ago, I ordered
another
> >> > 128mb module from Kingston Technology. (By the way, Sony recommends
> > them,
> >> > and Crucial Technology to customers who want to buy more RAM). The
> > computer
> >> > has two slots, and a limit of 256mb.
> >> >
> >> > Anyway....with the 2nd module added, the computer runs for random
> > periods of
> >> > time, sometimes 10 minutes, sometimes a couple of hours, and then
> > freezes in
> >> > the middle of whatever I'm doing. No blue screen, no error messages.
It
> > just
> >> > stops responding completely. Not funny.
> >> >
> >> > Kingston apparently saw this as a challenge - they were terrific in
> > terms of
> >> > trying various different modules, and finally sending me a single
256mb
> >> > module to try. That didn't work, either. Other things we tried:
> >> >
> >> > - All Sony drivers (including BIOS) were updated to the ones
specified
> > as
> >> > compatible with WinXP. (Machine froze)
> >> > - Old & new modules were swapped between the two slots, in case
position
> > was
> >> > important. (Machine froze)
> >> > - Two identical Kingston 128mb modules were tried, in case there was
a
> >> > mismatch with the original Sony module. (Machine froze)
> >> > - Ran one Kingston 128mb module at a time. Machine did NOT freeze.
> >> > - Ran one Kingston 256mb module with other slot empty. (Machine
froze)
> >> >
> >> > Finally, Kingston gave up. I just received a 256mb chip from Crucial
> >> > Technology. Same problem. The machine doesn't seem to like running
with
> >> > 256mb of RAM. Is there anything I can tweak in WinXP to deal with
this,
> > or
> >> > does it seem more like a hardware issue?
> >>
> >> Have you run Memtest86 on the machine? Your problem is either the CPU,
the
> >> brdige chip or XP. If Memtest86 passes then the finger points to XP,
> >> if it fails Memtest86 then you have a problem with either the bridge
chip
> >> or your CPU. In either case there isn't anything that you can do about
it
> >> in a laptop.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Ran Memtest (for about 12 hours). Passed.
>
> Have you checked to see if there is an update available for your BIOS? If
> Memtest ran for 12 hours without a failure then it looks like your problem
> is software related. I'd update the BIOS if you can. If that doesn't fix
> it I'd do a clean install of XP or replace XP with Linux.
>
>
I have the latest BIOS update from Sony, intended for this computer, running
XP. Now, however, I'm dangerously tempted to search for something better at
the AMD web site, using the chipset info revealed by Memtest during its
test.
On the OTHER hand (and there's always another hand), the machine is running
flawlessly today.....so far. I made just ONE change with the current
module - something that did NOT make any difference with the Kingston units:
Moved the module to the other slot. I'm going to continue looking for
solutions, in case this fails.