Are there any issues with one employee using Outlook 2007 while the rest are
on Outlook 2003?

Are there any functions that we will lose?

Thanks

Jon

I use both against the same mailbox and about the only thing that I notice
is folder views get messed up over time. Other than that, haven't really
noticed anything out of the oridinary as a show stopper.

"jmcclain" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:3E0C9547-39E3-4035-9E81-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Are there any issues with one employee using Outlook 2007 while the rest
> are
> on Outlook 2003?
>
> Are there any functions that we will lose?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon

So a 2003 user should have no issues opening and reading 2007 messages?

"neo [mvp outlook]" wrote:

> I use both against the same mailbox and about the only thing that I notice
> is folder views get messed up over time. Other than that, haven't really
> noticed anything out of the oridinary as a show stopper.
>
> "jmcclain" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:3E0C9547-39E3-4035-9E81-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Are there any issues with one employee using Outlook 2007 while the rest
> > are
> > on Outlook 2003?
> >
> > Are there any functions that we will lose?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jon
>
>
>

Correct, no issues opening/reading/replying between the two. (I tend to
stick with HTML and Plain Text message formats 99.9% of the time.)


"jmcclain" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:16E401EC-E220-4580-94C5-(E-Mail Removed)...
> So a 2003 user should have no issues opening and reading 2007 messages?
>
> "neo [mvp outlook]" wrote:
>
>> I use both against the same mailbox and about the only thing that I
>> notice
>> is folder views get messed up over time. Other than that, haven't really
>> noticed anything out of the oridinary as a show stopper.
>>
>> "jmcclain" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:3E0C9547-39E3-4035-9E81-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > Are there any issues with one employee using Outlook 2007 while the
>> > rest
>> > are
>> > on Outlook 2003?
>> >
>> > Are there any functions that we will lose?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Jon
>>
>>
>>