PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Compact Function in Outlook 2007 under Windows 7

 
 
Richard Sparks
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st May 2010
Ever since I upgraded my computer's operating system to Windows 7, I have
found that using the Compact file function in Outlook 2007 to be much less
reliable. I have a relatively large pst file, and when I try to run the
"Compact Now" feature in Outlook to make it a little smaller, it is very slow
in performing that function, and I often see "Not Respoding" pop up on my
screen while it is running. It usually ends up completing the task, but it
seems to be very painful in doing that. I had none of these problems when
running either Vista or XP.

I find it hard to believe that I am the only user seeing this anomaly. Does
anyone have any information about this? Thanks.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Sparky
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      2nd May 2010
Hi Richard

I've observed the same. I had Outlook 2003 under XP on my previous machine
and it was flawless.

My PST file is 54 mg. Sadly , I don't have the answer , but it makes me a
little nervous.

I always select WORK OFFLINE before starting it BTW...



"Richard Sparks" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news8B0BD3A-78D3-4019-9856-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Ever since I upgraded my computer's operating system to Windows 7, I have
> found that using the Compact file function in Outlook 2007 to be much less
> reliable. I have a relatively large pst file, and when I try to run the
> "Compact Now" feature in Outlook to make it a little smaller, it is very
> slow
> in performing that function, and I often see "Not Respoding" pop up on my
> screen while it is running. It usually ends up completing the task, but
> it
> seems to be very painful in doing that. I had none of these problems when
> running either Vista or XP.
>
> I find it hard to believe that I am the only user seeing this anomaly.
> Does
> anyone have any information about this? Thanks.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Gordon
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      2nd May 2010

"Richard Sparks" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news8B0BD3A-78D3-4019-9856-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Ever since I upgraded my computer's operating system to Windows 7, I have
> found that using the Compact file function in Outlook 2007 to be much less
> reliable. I have a relatively large pst file, and when I try to run the
> "Compact Now" feature in Outlook to make it a little smaller, it is very
> slow
> in performing that function, and I often see "Not Respoding" pop up on my
> screen while it is running. It usually ends up completing the task, but
> it
> seems to be very painful in doing that. I had none of these problems when
> running either Vista or XP.
>
> I find it hard to believe that I am the only user seeing this anomaly.
> Does
> anyone have any information about this? Thanks.


If you are using the new Unicode pst format I think you'll find that Outlook
2007 "compacts as it goes" so to speak. You don't need to do a manual
compact unless you have deleted a large quantity of data.
That's probably why you only see a small decrease in file size when you do
it manually - Outlook has already done it!

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outlook Compact Function Richard Sparks Microsoft Outlook Discussion 0 28th Apr 2010 09:59 PM
Re: Outlook 2007 Does not Compact Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] Microsoft Outlook 0 8th Mar 2010 01:38 PM
Re: Outlook 2007 Does not Compact DL Microsoft Outlook 1 8th Mar 2010 12:21 AM
Re: Outlook 2007 Does not Compact Russ Valentine Microsoft Outlook 0 7th Mar 2010 08:17 PM
Compact just hangs in outlook 2007 Greg Elmassian Microsoft Outlook Discussion 0 12th Jan 2010 10:54 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 AM.