Is it possible to set Whidbey to target CF 1.1 platform?

I mean, CF 1.0, not 1.1.

"compulim" <123> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Is it possible to set Whidbey to target CF 1.1 platform?
>

SmartPhone apps target CF 1.0 in Whidbey, but other device apps target CF
2.0.

--
Ginny Caughey
..Net Compact Framework MVP



"compulim" <123> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>I mean, CF 1.0, not 1.1.
>
> "compulim" <123> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Is it possible to set Whidbey to target CF 1.1 platform?
>>
>
>

Thanks Ginny!

Any way to set Whidbey to target 1.0 on PPC?

Or is it legal to publish software that requires 2.0 to end users? Any end
user redistributable available?

"Ginny Caughey [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> SmartPhone apps target CF 1.0 in Whidbey, but other device apps target CF
> 2.0.
>
> --
> Ginny Caughey
> .Net Compact Framework MVP
>
>
>
> "compulim" <123> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I mean, CF 1.0, not 1.1.
>>
>> "compulim" <123> wrote in message
>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Is it possible to set Whidbey to target CF 1.1 platform?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

There is no way to make an application compiled aginst .NET CF 2.0 to run
against .NET CF 1.0 without having .NET CF 2.0 on the device. The act of
changing the target framework is known as binding redirection and this is
only available in .NET CF 2.0 (in a basic form).

At the present time, there is no license available to you that will allow
you to distibute .NET CF 2.0 applications.

HTH
Neil



"compulim" <123> wrote in message
news:O%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Thanks Ginny!
>
> Any way to set Whidbey to target 1.0 on PPC?
>
> Or is it legal to publish software that requires 2.0 to end users? Any end
> user redistributable available?
>
> "Ginny Caughey [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> message news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> SmartPhone apps target CF 1.0 in Whidbey, but other device apps target CF
>> 2.0.
>>
>> --
>> Ginny Caughey
>> .Net Compact Framework MVP
>>
>>
>>
>> "compulim" <123> wrote in message
>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>I mean, CF 1.0, not 1.1.
>>>
>>> "compulim" <123> wrote in message
>>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> Is it possible to set Whidbey to target CF 1.1 platform?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Neil Cowburn <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> There is no way to make an application compiled aginst .NET CF 2.0 to run
> against .NET CF 1.0 without having .NET CF 2.0 on the device. The act of
> changing the target framework is known as binding redirection and this is
> only available in .NET CF 2.0 (in a basic form).
>
> At the present time, there is no license available to you that will allow
> you to distibute .NET CF 2.0 applications.

But is it possible to compile in Whidbey against .NET CF 1.0? If not,
that would be a major blow - I'd really like the features of Whibey (as
an IDE) but our customers are unlikely to be using .NET CF 2.0 in the
near future...

--
Jon Skeet - <(E-Mail Removed)>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

Last I heard (July), Whidbey would target CF 2.0 only :-(
[with the exception of SmartPhone projects of course]

Cheers
Daniel


"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Neil Cowburn <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > There is no way to make an application compiled aginst .NET CF 2.0 to
run
> > against .NET CF 1.0 without having .NET CF 2.0 on the device. The act of
> > changing the target framework is known as binding redirection and this
is
> > only available in .NET CF 2.0 (in a basic form).
> >
> > At the present time, there is no license available to you that will
allow
> > you to distibute .NET CF 2.0 applications.
>
> But is it possible to compile in Whidbey against .NET CF 1.0? If not,
> that would be a major blow - I'd really like the features of Whibey (as
> an IDE) but our customers are unlikely to be using .NET CF 2.0 in the
> near future...
>
> --
> Jon Skeet - <(E-Mail Removed)>
> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
> If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

Unfortunately, Microsoft has no plans to support .NET CF 1.0 for Pocket PC
or Windows CE in Whidbey

"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Neil Cowburn <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> There is no way to make an application compiled aginst .NET CF 2.0 to run
>> against .NET CF 1.0 without having .NET CF 2.0 on the device. The act of
>> changing the target framework is known as binding redirection and this is
>> only available in .NET CF 2.0 (in a basic form).
>>
>> At the present time, there is no license available to you that will allow
>> you to distibute .NET CF 2.0 applications.
>
> But is it possible to compile in Whidbey against .NET CF 1.0? If not,
> that would be a major blow - I'd really like the features of Whibey (as
> an IDE) but our customers are unlikely to be using .NET CF 2.0 in the
> near future...
>
> --
> Jon Skeet - <(E-Mail Removed)>
> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
> If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

Neil Cowburn <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Unfortunately, Microsoft has no plans to support .NET CF 1.0 for Pocket PC
> or Windows CE in Whidbey

Oh joy. I hope they get things right in terms of VS.NET 2003 and VS.NET
2005 co-existing then (I gather things are flaky with the beta, which
is what I'd expect) as we will definitely be wanting to use .NET 2.0
for some things (web services etc) but still developing CF 1.0 apps.

I'm sure we can't be the only business in that position...

--
Jon Skeet - <(E-Mail Removed)>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

Jon,

I'm running both versions of VS on my production machine with no issues, so
I'm pretty sure they'll work side by side for release.

--
Ginny Caughey
..Net Compact Framework MVP



"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Neil Cowburn <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, Microsoft has no plans to support .NET CF 1.0 for Pocket
>> PC
>> or Windows CE in Whidbey
>
> Oh joy. I hope they get things right in terms of VS.NET 2003 and VS.NET
> 2005 co-existing then (I gather things are flaky with the beta, which
> is what I'd expect) as we will definitely be wanting to use .NET 2.0
> for some things (web services etc) but still developing CF 1.0 apps.
>
> I'm sure we can't be the only business in that position...
>
> --
> Jon Skeet - <(E-Mail Removed)>
> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
> If replying to the group, please do not mail me too