Sean:
What constitutes ' information that has been previously entered'? Is it one
particular field? More than one? All fields?
I suspect, however, that your question may be indicative of a design flaw in
the database. I might be wrong but it does rather sound like there is a lot
of redundancy if there is the possibility of records being near duplicated.
The relational database model eliminates redundancy as far as possible by
means of related tables, each of which represents an entity type, e.g.
Customers, Orders, Order Details, Products. This ensures that each 'fact' is
stored only once and thus avoids inconsistencies arising from 'update
anomalies' which might otherwise occur.
If you can explain what the database is recording we can probably advise you
further, but while its possible to give an answer to your question once the
clarification sought in the first paragraph above is available, we could very
easily be giving you bad advice unwittingly.
Ken Sheridan
Stafford, England
"sheelen" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I should start by thanking you for taking the time to address my inquiry, as
> well as admitting that I have absolutely zero experience w/ programming in
> Access. So, if you are kind enough to offer a code or expression to help me
> out, please understand that I may need some serious assistance getting
> through it.
>
> That having been said, I have a question. I have a form - "Data Entry" -
> that has 20+ fields. The database contains over 100 records. I have been
> asked to update the database (which I did not originally design) to do the
> following:
>
> When the person entering information into a new record in the "Data Entry"
> form enters information that has been previously entered, the form should
> either:
>
> 1. Revert immediately back to the record containing the already submitted
> information; or
>
> 2. Auto-Fill in all remaining fields in the new record.
>
> My understanding is that I should use a combo box. However, I have only
> been able to have the combo box select the field that it is referring to, but
> not fill in any of the other fields.
>
> Thank you,
> Sean
|