PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

CMD Shell properties in WinXP Professional

 
 
eljainc
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Jan 2008
Hello, I've changed the shell to be a batch file, instead of using the
standard explore.exe as done in the registry under the following:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion
\Winlogon.

When my batch file loads at startup, it runs fine. However I can see a
tiny little window in the lower left (actually it is just the titlebar
with the border icons (for minimize/restore/close). Is there a way
that I can make this so it will be invisible? Could I possibly use a
batch file compiler? Would that fix this problem?

Thanks
Mike
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Terry R.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Jan 2008
The date and time was 1/12/2008 6:42 AM, and on a whim, eljainc pounded
out on the keyboard:

> Hello, I've changed the shell to be a batch file, instead of using the
> standard explore.exe as done in the registry under the following:
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion
> \Winlogon.
>
> When my batch file loads at startup, it runs fine. However I can see a
> tiny little window in the lower left (actually it is just the titlebar
> with the border icons (for minimize/restore/close). Is there a way
> that I can make this so it will be invisible? Could I possibly use a
> batch file compiler? Would that fix this problem?
>
> Thanks
> Mike


Hi Mike,

A batch file will be passed to CMD.EXE (or command.com if specified) for
execution, which will have a momentary appearance on the screen. Years
ago I used a program that would convert batch commands to an exe. A
google search brought this up:
http://www.download.com/3000-2069_4-10715331.html

Give that a try.

Report back,

--
Terry R.

***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Pegasus \(MVP\)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Jan 2008

"eljainc" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f7d46d75-8cd8-405a-bfc2-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello, I've changed the shell to be a batch file, instead of using the
> standard explore.exe as done in the registry under the following:
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion
> \Winlogon.
>
> When my batch file loads at startup, it runs fine. However I can see a
> tiny little window in the lower left (actually it is just the titlebar
> with the border icons (for minimize/restore/close). Is there a way
> that I can make this so it will be invisible? Could I possibly use a
> batch file compiler? Would that fix this problem?
>
> Thanks
> Mike


What exactly is the purpose of replacing the standard shell?


 
Reply With Quote
 
eljainc
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Jan 2008
On Jan 12, 11:35 am, "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I....@fly.com.oz> wrote:
> "eljainc" <elja...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>
> news:f7d46d75-8cd8-405a-bfc2-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> > Hello, I've changed the shell to be a batch file, instead of using the
> > standard explore.exe as done in the registry under the following:

>
> > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion
> > \Winlogon.

>
> > When my batch file loads at startup, it runs fine. However I can see a
> > tiny little window in the lower left (actually it is just the titlebar
> > with the border icons (for minimize/restore/close). Is there a way
> > that I can make this so it will be invisible? Could I possibly use a
> > batch file compiler? Would that fix this problem?

>
> > Thanks
> > Mike

>
> What exactly is the purpose of replacing the standard shell?


I would like to make the program start up seemless (for the most part)
without the windows taskbar or start menu.That is why I'm replacing
the standard shell.

Mike
 
Reply With Quote
 
Pegasus \(MVP\)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Jan 2008

"eljainc" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:6da37261-6739-470c-adae-(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Jan 12, 11:35 am, "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I....@fly.com.oz> wrote:
>> "eljainc" <elja...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:f7d46d75-8cd8-405a-bfc2-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>> > Hello, I've changed the shell to be a batch file, instead of using the
>> > standard explore.exe as done in the registry under the following:

>>
>> > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion
>> > \Winlogon.

>>
>> > When my batch file loads at startup, it runs fine. However I can see a
>> > tiny little window in the lower left (actually it is just the titlebar
>> > with the border icons (for minimize/restore/close). Is there a way
>> > that I can make this so it will be invisible? Could I possibly use a
>> > batch file compiler? Would that fix this problem?

>>
>> > Thanks
>> > Mike

>>
>> What exactly is the purpose of replacing the standard shell?

>
> I would like to make the program start up seemless (for the most part)
> without the windows taskbar or start menu.That is why I'm replacing
> the standard shell.
>
> Mike


A more convential method to start a program seamlessly would
be to start it via the "Run" registry key or as a service (if no
interaction with the foreground session is needed).


 
Reply With Quote
 
eljainc
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      14th Jan 2008

> A more convential method to start a program seamlessly would
> be to start it via the "Run" registry key or as a service (if no
> interaction with the foreground session is needed).


Would that still remove the appearance of the taskbar and start menu?
I can give it a shot.

Mike

 
Reply With Quote
 
Pegasus \(MVP\)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      14th Jan 2008

"eljainc" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:8f86ac5e-b8a4-41e9-9800-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>> A more convential method to start a program seamlessly would
>> be to start it via the "Run" registry key or as a service (if no
>> interaction with the foreground session is needed).

>
> Would that still remove the appearance of the taskbar and start menu?
> I can give it a shot.
>
> Mike
>


No, the Task Bar and the Start Button would remain visible.
I suspect that you may have to replace the command shell
with an executable in order to meet your requirements, not
just with a humble batch file.


 
Reply With Quote
 
eljainc
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Jan 2008
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> A batch file will be passed to CMD.EXE (or command.com if specified) for
> execution, which will have a momentary appearance on the screen. *Years
> ago I used a program that would convert batch commands to an exe. *A
> google search brought this up:http://www.download.com/3000-2069_4-10715331..html
>
> Give that a try.
>
> Report back,
> Terry R.


Terry,

I downloaded the BAT2EXE program and converted the batch file to an
EXE. It does not behave any differently. The little window still
appears.

Mike
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DSA.msc user properties (Shell properties) dave@lustyd.co.uk Microsoft C# .NET 0 1st May 2007 03:04 PM
WinXP Media Center 2005 vs. WinXP Professional katy Windows XP General 3 6th Apr 2005 12:32 AM
multiboot configuration - WinXP Home, WinXP Professional, Fedora Linux, Windows 2003 Server Clint Maxwell Windows XP Help 1 25th Mar 2004 08:53 PM
Changing the user shell in XP Professional Mike Windows XP Customization 1 26th Feb 2004 04:28 AM
MS2000 Server or Professional Remote Shell Service Ed Abel Microsoft Windows 2000 Registry 0 9th Aug 2003 06:39 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:46 PM.