PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Citrix & win2k policy problem...

 
 
John
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Aug 2003
Hi all,
I have this problem that I can not find any sollution for, maybe you know
how to solve this?

I have a published application on citrix metaframe 1.8.
I do not want users to access the local drives, so I disabled access to
local drives in the policy. This works well....
Now I want users to have some space on the server for storing and working
with Office files, but that is not possible, because I disabled access to
local drives. Now to me it seems that the only sollution is to enable it
again. But that causes trouble, because users are then able to access the
drives and parts of the drives where they do not belong, which I do not want
to happen.
So the problem is that I want them to be able to acess a part of the drive
but I do not want them to be able to access the whole drive. I have already
used drive mapping to a network share, but that does not work. I also
played with user rights on file-level, but that is not good enough, because
the users also must be able to access the files in the application path to
start the application of course....
There is also a problem that users can manually specify a location in the
published application and when users are smart enough they can specify the
drive that is not visible in "my computer", when local-drive access is
enabled.

If anyone knows how to deal with this I would be very pleased.

Cheers,
John


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Tristan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Aug 2003
"John" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:3f321273$0$49106$(E-Mail Removed):

> Hi all,
> I have this problem that I can not find any sollution for, maybe you
> know how to solve this?
>
> I have a published application on citrix metaframe 1.8.
> I do not want users to access the local drives, so I disabled access
> to local drives in the policy. This works well....
> Now I want users to have some space on the server for storing and
> working with Office files, but that is not possible, because I
> disabled access to local drives. Now to me it seems that the only
> sollution is to enable it again. But that causes trouble, because
> users are then able to access the drives and parts of the drives where
> they do not belong, which I do not want to happen.
> So the problem is that I want them to be able to acess a part of the
> drive but I do not want them to be able to access the whole drive. I
> have already used drive mapping to a network share, but that does not
> work. I also played with user rights on file-level, but that is not
> good enough, because the users also must be able to access the files
> in the application path to start the application of course....
> There is also a problem that users can manually specify a location in
> the published application and when users are smart enough they can
> specify the drive that is not visible in "my computer", when
> local-drive access is enabled.
>
> If anyone knows how to deal with this I would be very pleased.
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
>
>


Their is a policy that disable access to specified drives. Use it and
users will not be able to access again drives: this allow them to click
shortcut but doen't allow them to browse specified drive even their are
or not hidden.
Create another partition to store application data.
Redirect every default path of application to this partition: a lot of
application already use "My Documents" (redirect via GPO or potch the
user registry), for others, edit registry (ex: WinZip) or make
application compatibility script like existing scripts.

If you don't disable access to drives, any user will be able to access
any drives or run any system EXE like CMD.EXE ......: Running write.exe
is suffisant to start any EXE of any drive.

The most difficult is to scan every published application to find
possibilities to open a browser on default system drive.

Another solution: Use AppSense Application Manager.

Tristan
 
Reply With Quote
 
John
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Aug 2003
Hi Tristan,
Thank you for your information, I will sure use it in my R&I .
We use AppSense Performance Manager somewhere else, and I have been told
that it is very expensive and unfortunately I am not in that luxurious
position.

Cheers!
John


"Tristan" <tlyonnet_@_free.fr> wrote in message
news:Xns93D1392DEFB3CSimmy78@140.99.99.130...
> "John" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> news:3f321273$0$49106$(E-Mail Removed):
>
> > Hi all,
> > I have this problem that I can not find any sollution for, maybe you
> > know how to solve this?
> >
> > I have a published application on citrix metaframe 1.8.
> > I do not want users to access the local drives, so I disabled access
> > to local drives in the policy. This works well....
> > Now I want users to have some space on the server for storing and
> > working with Office files, but that is not possible, because I
> > disabled access to local drives. Now to me it seems that the only
> > sollution is to enable it again. But that causes trouble, because
> > users are then able to access the drives and parts of the drives where
> > they do not belong, which I do not want to happen.
> > So the problem is that I want them to be able to acess a part of the
> > drive but I do not want them to be able to access the whole drive. I
> > have already used drive mapping to a network share, but that does not
> > work. I also played with user rights on file-level, but that is not
> > good enough, because the users also must be able to access the files
> > in the application path to start the application of course....
> > There is also a problem that users can manually specify a location in
> > the published application and when users are smart enough they can
> > specify the drive that is not visible in "my computer", when
> > local-drive access is enabled.
> >
> > If anyone knows how to deal with this I would be very pleased.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > John
> >
> >
> >

>
> Their is a policy that disable access to specified drives. Use it and
> users will not be able to access again drives: this allow them to click
> shortcut but doen't allow them to browse specified drive even their are
> or not hidden.
> Create another partition to store application data.
> Redirect every default path of application to this partition: a lot of
> application already use "My Documents" (redirect via GPO or potch the
> user registry), for others, edit registry (ex: WinZip) or make
> application compatibility script like existing scripts.
>
> If you don't disable access to drives, any user will be able to access
> any drives or run any system EXE like CMD.EXE ......: Running write.exe
> is suffisant to start any EXE of any drive.
>
> The most difficult is to scan every published application to find
> possibilities to open a browser on default system drive.
>
> Another solution: Use AppSense Application Manager.
>
> Tristan



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please help Dr Watson with c0000005 on Win2K + Citrix ThomasT. Microsoft Windows 2000 Terminal Server Applications 1 6th Jun 2006 02:49 PM
Going to put SP4 on Win2K TS - also a Citrix question Ed Hansberry, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices Microsoft Windows 2000 Terminal Server Applications 1 21st Oct 2004 09:17 PM
User Policy for Citrix Brian Microsoft Windows 2000 Group Policy 3 15th Dec 2003 03:45 PM
Citrix / policy issue? John Microsoft Windows 2000 Group Policy 1 20th Aug 2003 11:41 AM
Win2k group policy problem Tim D Microsoft Windows 2000 Group Policy 2 30th Jul 2003 05:13 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:10 AM.