Each time I go into our local Staples store to look for printer paper
(Brother HL-1440 or HP Photosmart 6100), I have to shake my head at the
variety of choices, and wide difference in costs. Perhaps I should
consult my users manuals.

A search on Google produces no real discussion on how to do this. Should
I care about whether it's recycle (forgetting for a moment it saves
trees), paper, % recycled, or just "fresh" paper. Interestingly, 50%
recycled seems more costly than 30%. BTW, whatever happened to acid free
paper?

Most of my paper demands are for print outs of web pages, pdfs, or from
e-mails. Most is b/w. Sometimes I want to use color on quality paper.

Is there any hope that some day when I want a pdf manual printed with
maybe 5 to 10% of color images in it that they may actually have a
copier that calculates the color vs black ink used, and produces an
equitable price rather than calling every page color?

Comments?

I have a monochrome laser printer and an inkjet color printer. For both, I
use store-brand (Office Depot or Staples) "multi-purpose" paper for general
everyday printing. For "camera-ready copy" from the laser, I use Hammermill
Laser Print or Xerox Premium Laser paper (24# as opposed to 20# and a harder
surface). On the inkjet, for "good" printout, I have a quality (again 24#)
inkjet paper.

As for the PDF printing, I've found my local PostNet quite reasonable. They
actually do have a computer controller that calculates black vs. color and
charges accordingly. Before Christmas I had seven copies of a 200-page book
(my mother's autobiography) printed. The charge was $0.06 a page for B&W,
$0.29 for color, and the proportion ended up being 938 B&W ($56.28) and 448
color ($129.92). With $4.50 apiece for binding, plus tax, the total was
$237.29, or less than $34 a copy, which was more than acceptable, IMO, for a
Christmas gift for my brothers and children.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"W. eWatson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:ijkl45$hv6$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Each time I go into our local Staples store to look for printer paper
> (Brother HL-1440 or HP Photosmart 6100), I have to shake my head at the
> variety of choices, and wide difference in costs. Perhaps I should consult
> my users manuals.
>
> A search on Google produces no real discussion on how to do this. Should I
> care about whether it's recycle (forgetting for a moment it saves trees),
> paper, % recycled, or just "fresh" paper. Interestingly, 50% recycled
> seems more costly than 30%. BTW, whatever happened to acid free paper?
>
> Most of my paper demands are for print outs of web pages, pdfs, or from
> e-mails. Most is b/w. Sometimes I want to use color on quality paper.
>
> Is there any hope that some day when I want a pdf manual printed with
> maybe 5 to 10% of color images in it that they may actually have a copier
> that calculates the color vs black ink used, and produces an equitable
> price rather than calling every page color?
>
> Comments?
>

On 2/17/2011 9:08 PM, Suzanne S. Barnhill wrote:
> I have a monochrome laser printer and an inkjet color printer. For both,
> I use store-brand (Office Depot or Staples) "multi-purpose" paper for
> general everyday printing. For "camera-ready copy" from the laser, I use
> Hammermill Laser Print or Xerox Premium Laser paper (24# as opposed to
> 20# and a harder surface). On the inkjet, for "good" printout, I have a
> quality (again 24#) inkjet paper.
>
> As for the PDF printing, I've found my local PostNet quite reasonable.
> They actually do have a computer controller that calculates black vs.
> color and charges accordingly. Before Christmas I had seven copies of a
> 200-page book (my mother's autobiography) printed. The charge was $0.06
> a page for B&W, $0.29 for color, and the proportion ended up being 938
> B&W ($56.28) and 448 color ($129.92). With $4.50 apiece for binding,
> plus tax, the total was $237.29, or less than $34 a copy, which was more
> than acceptable, IMO, for a Christmas gift for my brothers and children.
>
Thanks.