On Nov 20, 6:56 pm, "dobey" <a...@v.nox> wrote:
> <cozz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:aef4f40e-4f50-473c-93c2-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>
>
> > On Nov 18, 7:15 pm, "dobey" <a...@v.nox> wrote:
> >> "Unknown" <unkn...@unknown.kom> wrote in message
>
> >>news:mCZ%i.60091$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> >> You should run chkdsk occasionally, (I would say once a month), and fix
> >> any
> >> small problems before they snowball into a no-boot situation. If you just
> >> run chkdsk without parameters it will run in read-only mode and report
> >> any
> >> errors.
>
> > The keyboard issue was just an inconvenience. The "no-boot situation"
> > is what really concerns me.
> > I am curious if this was
> > just a result of some bad crashes due to previous hardware issues?
> > It seems unusual that not running this obscure commands could render a
> > PC useless, have anyone else out there ever experienced this?
>
> > thanks,
> >crzzy1
>
> Wouldn't call the command obscure. I expect it's not recomended that often
> because it takes a lot longer, (because it checks the free space also), and
> usually chkdsk /f will fix file system problems in the same fashion. I use
> /r to check the entire disk when I install a new disk, and only if I suspect
> a disk problem later on. Otherwise I do as I've suggested and use /f if
> needed.
>
> Small filesytem errors can snowball into bigger ones over time. Sometimes a
> program refuses to run, when it is system files, then your OS refuses to
> run. ;-)
>
> NTFS is more complicated than FAT32, and I expect with the increasing
> variation, (and quality), of hardware and software drive controllers around
> there is a greater chance of file corruption etc. I don't know if using EEC
> memory in your PC helps or not.
>
> I've not had your particular problem, (as I run chkdsk regularly), but I did
> have a situation where I was happily typing away and a littly yellow
> exclamation mark informed me my system32 directory had become corrupt and
> unuseable. Then I kept typing unhappily, as I knew I wouldn't be able to
> reboot and needed to do a repair install. In that case it was a dodgy disk
> controller causing the problems.
>
> How long had you been running your PC without running chkdsk?
It is a new PC with xp and 2 gigs, it was wrought with HW problems in
the beginning and had the motherboard and PS replaced just 2 weeks ago
by the manufacturer.
I never ran chkdsk before this, however I have a PC that is 7 years
old and don't remember running chkdsk on it ever.
I am somewhat wondering if I am still having HW issues on this PC.
I just ran the second ever chkdisk /f and rebooted to be sure, the PC
has been running for a couple hours since and I just did a chkdsk
(below) and I am somewhat bummed to see that it found errors right
away again.
C:\>chkdsk
The type of the file system is NTFS.
WARNING! F parameter not specified.
Running CHKDSK in read-only mode.
CHKDSK is verifying files (stage 1 of 3)...
File verification completed.
CHKDSK is verifying indexes (stage 2 of 3)...
Index verification completed.
CHKDSK is recovering lost files.
CHKDSK is verifying security descriptors (stage 3 of 3)...
Security descriptor verification completed.
CHKDSK is verifying Usn Journal...
Repairing Usn Journal file record segment.
Usn Journal verification completed.
Correcting errors in the master file table's (MFT) BITMAP attribute.
Correcting errors in the Volume Bitmap.
Windows found problems with the file system.
Run CHKDSK with the /F (fix) option to correct these.
312569513 KB total disk space.
190230436 KB in 54036 files.
18632 KB in 5841 indexes.
0 KB in bad sectors.
172385 KB in use by the system.
65536 KB occupied by the log file.
122148060 KB available on disk.
4096 bytes in each allocation unit.
78142378 total allocation units on disk.
30537015 allocation units available on disk.
What causes this??
|