Good point on the "knowing what's inside the enclosure". When I purchased
the drive it was cheaper than a separate enclosure and drive. It's the only
single-unit combo I have as I have purchased separate IDE/SATA and drives
before and since then. I DO think there may be issues with the
enclosure/circuitry/drive but I haven't been able to focus on any issue. I
know the drive does NOT work well w/ our Win2K3 server whether that's a
compatibility issue or what I don't know. So, I essentially plug in, turn on
and copy files from my laptop etc to the drive and then disconnect it and
turn it off. This reduces our risk. I also have a separate 300GB SATA drive
on our network that we copy files to. It was in a SATA enclosure and the
previous drive's life was shorted due to lack of heat dissipation. After we
received a replacement drive we opened up the enclosure so that the heat is
dissipated immediately into the air rather than hold the heat inside the
enclosure etc.
One of our next purchases on either a server or a set of external drives is
to RAID them but that's currently not in the '90-day budget'.
On copying files to DVD etc. we do that from time to time but one of our
files is now nearly 7GB. We need to break it down into several smaller files
for the DVD copying option. BUt this all takes time which is small now
unless you know of an automated DVD creation app. We tried WinZip a couple
of years ago but it wouldn't support active DVD copying.
Thanks!
[Oh, on the CHKDSK... why did we 'do it'? My laptop evidently restarted
'on-its-own' and did the CHKDSK during the night.]
Tom
"Patrick Keenan" wrote:
>
> "Tom" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:8F8D9147-FA58-4BE8-B356-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > No it's not under warranty. ;-(
>
> As to warranties, disk companies deal with this by replacing the drive. If
> you send in your drive, you will never see your data again... unless someone
> else gets the drive and takes a look.
>
> > Are there known issues with the Maxtor drive
>
> There are a number of complaints.
>
> But in some cases it appears that the problem is teh *enclosure*, not the
> *disk*. Try removing the drive from the enclosure and using another one,
> or connecting it directly to a SATA or IDE connector.
>
> > or would Windows to the CHKDSK
> > because I plugged the device into a USB2 port on my laptop?
>
> Possibly if the enclosure circuitry was flaky.
>
> > As to the original question, what do you think about aborting the CHKDSK?
> > Chkdsk did search drive E (750GB Maxtor) and the 160GB Western Digital.
> >
> > Do I need to backup my backup drives?
>
> Yes. It's not a good idea to have only one copy of your backup, either.
> Many offices I deal with have a rotating set of backups, one for each day of
> the week.
>
> At the moment, I will suggest moving some more critical files off to DVD.
> When prices for burners and disks drop to something reasonable, I will
> suggest usign Blu-Ray disks for backup. And again, burn two copies - move
> one offsite.
>
> Or, get another hard disk and copy to it as well.
>
> I don't know if Maxtors have improved since their class action suit and
> takeover by Seagate, as I stopped using them after too many of the ones I
> had, failed.
>
> I don't even consider buying pre-assembled external drives, since I may not
> know the most important and basic fact - what is the drive inside?
>
>
> > Drive F (160GB Western Digital) is an
> > external USB drive I use to store misc things that I can't store on my
> > 80GB
> > internal due to space limitation issues.
> > TIA!
> >
> > "Tae Song" wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Tom" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> news:64F83210-BAA5-4F27-997C-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > WinXP Pro SP3
> >> > 80GB 5400rpm internal drive (Toshiba) [Drive C]
> >> > 160GB 5400rpm external USB2 drive (Western Digital) [Drive F]
> >> > 750GB external USB2 drive (Maxtor OneTouch) - unknown rpm... [Drive E]
> >> >
> >> > This AM my laptop was going through a CHKDSK on the 750GB external
> >> > Maxtor
> >> > OneTouch drive. I don't know why... it just was. The CHKDSK was about
> >> > 84%
> >> > processed in Stage 4 when I first noticed it. Since I had a meeting
> >> > out
> >> > of
> >> > the office I let it run. After I got back the 160GB drive was about
> >> > 94%
> >> > completed on Stage 5 so I let it finish. I then rebooted and we're
> >> > fine...
> >> > ;-))
> >> >
> >> > 1) Can I abort a CHKDSK by just turning off the computer?
> >> > 2) If so, in what stages can I do this? It became painfully obvious
> >> > that
> >> > if
> >> > the 750GB Maxtor drive was only 5% complete that I'd be waiting all day
> >> > for
> >> > the processing to end.
> >> > 3) What are the implications here of turning off the computer during
> >> > one
> >> > of
> >> > the five (5) stages? If ESCaped out during Stage 1 but never turned
> >> > off
> >> > the
> >> > computer ... yet... [This is a threat to my computer's OS livelihood.
> >> > Make
> >> > sure all comments are kind and considerate so as to not injury 'its'
> >> > personality or feelings! ;-)) ]
> >> > Can I take-back control from my one-eyed beast? '-)
> >> > TIA!
> >>
> >> You might be facing imminent hard drive failure on the 750GB Maxtor. Is
> >> it
> >> still under warrantee?
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
|