"Ken Blake, MVP" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:47:47 -0500, Uncle Grumpy
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:31:56 -0400, "R. McCarty"
>> ><PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> A good question. First you should always do a Chkdsk on the
>> >> volume before doing a defrag.
>> >
>> >Sorry, I don't agree with this at all. You never need to run chkdsk
>> >unless you have reason to suspect a problem.
>>
>> But it doesn't hurt (or take much time) to run it.
>
>
> That's true, but irrelevant to my comment. The statement "you should
> always do a Chkdsk on the volume before doing a defrag" is not
> correct, and I pointed that out.
>
>
>
>> >I defrag regularly (once a month or so) but never run chkdsk.
>>
>> Many "experts" would say that such a schedule for defragging in XP is
>> totally unnecessary ;-)
>>
>> I for one agree.
>
>
> How often to defrag depends on how you use your computer and how much
> you use your computer. There is no single schedule that's right for
> everybody.
>
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
I am with Ken here. I only run chkdsk when I feel like it; perhaps once or
twice per year. Every now and then (once per month or so), I run dfrag. I
only defrag when the utility tells me to (perhaps one time out of four).
I really suspect that the benefits of dfragmentation these days is more
cosmetic than anything else.
Jim
|