What Cchipset won all 6 application benchmarks run at Tomhardware?
The new NF3-250? Nope
Via's K8T800? Nope
Surely not the SIS755? Yep.:-)

And if you look at the margin of victory for each chipset over the entire
barage of test run, I concluded the SIS755 won overall. Tom's says the new
Nvidia does though. All were very close with the exception of the old
MF3-150.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 22:58:28 GMT, Wes Newell
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>What Cchipset won all 6 application benchmarks run at Tomhardware?
>The new NF3-250? Nope
>Via's K8T800? Nope
>Surely not the SIS755? Yep.:-)
>
>And if you look at the margin of victory for each chipset over the entire
>barage of test run, I concluded the SIS755 won overall. Tom's says the new
>Nvidia does though. All were very close with the exception of the old
>MF3-150.

Which one(s) wins on reliability and stability? Speed isn't everything.
;p

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:20:53 +0000, Ed wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 22:58:28 GMT, Wes Newell
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>What Cchipset won all 6 application benchmarks run at Tomhardware?
>>The new NF3-250? Nope
>>Via's K8T800? Nope
>>Surely not the SIS755? Yep.:-)
>>
>>And if you look at the margin of victory for each chipset over the entire
>>barage of test run, I concluded the SIS755 won overall. Tom's says the new
>>Nvidia does though. All were very close with the exception of the old
>>MF3-150.
>
> Which one(s) wins on reliability and stability? Speed isn't everything.
> ;p
They're pobably all pretty reliable when set up properly.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:56:34 GMT, Wes Newell
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:20:53 +0000, Ed wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 22:58:28 GMT, Wes Newell
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>What Cchipset won all 6 application benchmarks run at Tomhardware?
>>>The new NF3-250? Nope
>>>Via's K8T800? Nope
>>>Surely not the SIS755? Yep.:-)
>>>
>>>And if you look at the margin of victory for each chipset over the entire
>>>barage of test run, I concluded the SIS755 won overall. Tom's says the new
>>>Nvidia does though. All were very close with the exception of the old
>>>MF3-150.
>>
>> Which one(s) wins on reliability and stability? Speed isn't everything.
>> ;p
>They're pobably all pretty reliable when set up properly.

I'm not a big fan of VIA but the 3 AMD 64 K8T800s I play with on a daily
basis have impressed me, it's hard to believe it's a VIA chipset under
the hood! ;p

Cheers,
Ed