http://www.webtechinstitute.com/
Unbelieveable! Certainly this practice will get them 'black-listed' from the
search engines, won't it?
Eleanor

Amazing. Gotta congratulate the site developers for perseverance. A
lot of effort went into building those keywords. I don't think they
missed anything. I think I saw "1955 Buick" in there someplace. Google
would need a dedicated server just to cope with that single page.
(Grin.)

"E. T. Culling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://www.webtechinstitute.com/
> Unbelieveable! Certainly this practice will get them 'black-listed'
> from the search engines, won't it?
> Eleanor
>

Yeah. I looked at this site from a link at Stan, the scum-bag realtor, site.

These guys are truly unprofessional in many, many ways. I especially like
the 260K+, badly size image. I wonder if any of those people actually work
there, or if they just came from some stock photo CD.

Bob Lehmann

"E. T. Culling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://www.webtechinstitute.com/
> Unbelieveable! Certainly this practice will get them 'black-listed' from
the
> search engines, won't it?
> Eleanor
>
>

Well ET, the only "good thing" I can say about that site and the "institute" is that it
will eventually self destruct.

;-)

--
Steve Easton
Microsoft MVP FrontPage
95isalive
This site is best viewed............
........................with a computer

"E. T. Culling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://www.webtechinstitute.com/
> Unbelieveable! Certainly this practice will get them 'black-listed' from the
> search engines, won't it?
> Eleanor
>
>

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search



"E. T. Culling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://www.webtechinstitute.com/
> Unbelieveable! Certainly this practice will get them 'black-listed' from
> the search engines, won't it?
> Eleanor
>

Not only that but many companies who have invested so much in building their
brands who have registered trademarks have been winning awards in the courts
when the squatters such as the so-called webtechinstitute misuse a brand
name and registered trademark belonging to someone else when doing so
without a reasonable context for doing so.

For example, it is reasonable for a website merchant that resells inkjet
cartridges to use the brand names and trademark names of Canon and HP to
market the inkjet cartridges used with Canon and HP printers but that
merchant could get nailed for squatting on trademark such as Playtex which
has nothing to do with inkjet cartridges.


<%= Clinton Gallagher
METROmilwaukee (sm) "A Regional Information Service"
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://metromilwaukee.com/
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/




"E. T. Culling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://www.webtechinstitute.com/
> Unbelieveable! Certainly this practice will get them 'black-listed' from
> the search engines, won't it?
> Eleanor
>