I'm looking to follow the instructions in the following document:
http://www.byteccusa.com/download/Vista%20ME850.pdf
secpol.msc doesnt exist on my system so how can I make this change?
Thanks!

Hi,

Home versions of Vista would not have a local security policy editor. What
change are you trying to make?

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com

"microsvc" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:9028691B-43E8-46B4-BDCF-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm looking to follow the instructions in the following document:
> http://www.byteccusa.com/download/Vista%20ME850.pdf
> secpol.msc doesnt exist on my system so how can I make this change?
> Thanks!

The change stated in the link I posted, a PDF document.

http://www.byteccusa.com/download/Vista%20ME850.pdf

Thx!


"Rick Rogers" wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Home versions of Vista would not have a local security policy editor. What
> change are you trying to make?
>
> --
> Best of Luck,
>
> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
> My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com
>
> "microsvc" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:9028691B-43E8-46B4-BDCF-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I'm looking to follow the instructions in the following document:
> > http://www.byteccusa.com/download/Vista%20ME850.pdf
> > secpol.msc doesnt exist on my system so how can I make this change?
> > Thanks!
>
>

I don't open files from unknown sources, nor do I want to spend time
downloading a potentially large pdf file just for a short explanation.
Please simply state what change you are trying to affect and why.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com

"microsvc" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:64104237-65FD-467F-BEAA-(E-Mail Removed)...
> The change stated in the link I posted, a PDF document.
>
> http://www.byteccusa.com/download/Vista%20ME850.pdf
>
> Thx!
>
>
> "Rick Rogers" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Home versions of Vista would not have a local security policy editor.
>> What
>> change are you trying to make?
>>
>> --
>> Best of Luck,
>>
>> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
>> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
>> My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com
>>
>> "microsvc" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:9028691B-43E8-46B4-BDCF-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > I'm looking to follow the instructions in the following document:
>> > http://www.byteccusa.com/download/Vista%20ME850.pdf
>> > secpol.msc doesnt exist on my system so how can I make this change?
>> > Thanks!
>>
>>

Rick Rogers wrote:
> I don't open files from unknown sources, nor do I want to spend time
> downloading a potentially large pdf file just for a short explanation.
> Please simply state what change you are trying to affect and why.
>


He is not getting the secpol.msc window is all, the PDF is just a
graphical description, I don't have Vista home running so don't know if
there's an administrative tools > local security policy option he can
reach, he wants to set...

> change the default value “NTVLM2 responses
> only” to “LM and NTLM – use NTLMV2 session security if
> negotiated”

If not will that be in the registry? I assume it must be in there
someplace

Charlie Tame wrote:
> Rick Rogers wrote:
>> I don't open files from unknown sources, nor do I want to spend time
>> downloading a potentially large pdf file just for a short explanation.
>> Please simply state what change you are trying to affect and why.
>>
>
>
> He is not getting the secpol.msc window is all, the PDF is just a
> graphical description, I don't have Vista home running so don't know if
> there's an administrative tools > local security policy option he can
> reach, he wants to set...
>
> > change the default value “NTVLM2 responses
>> only” to “LM and NTLM – use NTLMV2 session security if
>> negotiated”
>
> If not will that be in the registry? I assume it must be in there
> someplace

Since like Rick I'm not interested in downloading his file, I'll take
your word for it that the OP simply wants to change the NTVLM2 setting
in Vista Home.

In Vista Home Premium, you won't have this tool (secpol.msc) so per
Steve Winograd, do:

1. Run the registry editor and open this key:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa

1. If it doesn't already exist, create a DWORD value named
LmCompatibilityLevel

3. Set the value to 1

4. Reboot

If that isn't what the OP wants, then s/he needs to come back and tell
us what s/he's trying to do.


Malke
--
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic!"
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User

Malke wrote:
> Charlie Tame wrote:
>> Rick Rogers wrote:
>>> I don't open files from unknown sources, nor do I want to spend time
>>> downloading a potentially large pdf file just for a short
>>> explanation. Please simply state what change you are trying to affect
>>> and why.
>>>
>>
>>
>> He is not getting the secpol.msc window is all, the PDF is just a
>> graphical description, I don't have Vista home running so don't know
>> if there's an administrative tools > local security policy option he
>> can reach, he wants to set...
>>
>> > change the default value “NTVLM2 responses
>>> only” to “LM and NTLM – use NTLMV2 session security if
>>> negotiated”
>>
>> If not will that be in the registry? I assume it must be in there
>> someplace
>
> Since like Rick I'm not interested in downloading his file, I'll take
> your word for it that the OP simply wants to change the NTVLM2 setting
> in Vista Home.
>
> In Vista Home Premium, you won't have this tool (secpol.msc) so per
> Steve Winograd, do:
>
> 1. Run the registry editor and open this key:
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa
>
> 1. If it doesn't already exist, create a DWORD value named
> LmCompatibilityLevel
>
> 3. Set the value to 1
>
> 4. Reboot
>
> If that isn't what the OP wants, then s/he needs to come back and tell
> us what s/he's trying to do.
>
>
> Malke


I am pretty sure that was the purpose intended, thanks, it is hard to
tell what should be there when you don't have the version handy.