I'm on my bi-annual hunt on where to change my workgroup. I thought it
was somewhere in LAN Network properties? TCP/IP entry?

"Watty" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:0OJGk.1775$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm on my bi-annual hunt on where to change my workgroup. I thought it was
> somewhere in LAN Network properties? TCP/IP entry?


Control Panel -> System -> Computer Name -> Hit the Change button.

Good luck

Nepatsfan

Watty wrote:

> I'm on my bi-annual hunt on where to change my workgroup. I thought it
> was somewhere in LAN Network properties? TCP/IP entry?

To change the name of your Workgroup (a cosmetic process not affecting
network behavior), go to Control Panel>System>Computer Name tab.

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
FAQ - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ

"... (a cosmetic process not affecting
network behavior), >>>" ???


"Malke" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Watty wrote:
>
>> I'm on my bi-annual hunt on where to change my workgroup. I thought it
>> was somewhere in LAN Network properties? TCP/IP entry?
>
> To change the name of your Workgroup (a cosmetic process not affecting
> network behavior), go to Control Panel>System>Computer Name tab.
>
> Malke
> --
> MS-MVP
> Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
> FAQ - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ
>

AJR wrote:

> "... (a cosmetic process not affecting
> network behavior), >>>" ???

What didn't you understand about that? Workgroup names are just an
organizational device and do not affect networking in Windows XP. Nothing
prevents machines properly configured from successful file/printer sharing
even if they have disparate Workgroup names.

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
FAQ - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ

"Malke" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> AJR wrote:
>
>> "... (a cosmetic process not affecting
>> network behavior), >>>" ???
>
> What didn't you understand about that? Workgroup names are just an
> organizational device and do not affect networking in Windows XP. Nothing
> prevents machines properly configured from successful file/printer sharing
> even if they have disparate Workgroup names.

May be disparate computer names.

Are you saying that computers in a peer-to-peer network do not require to
have identical workgroup names?

"Watty" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:0OJGk.1775$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm on my bi-annual hunt on where to change my workgroup. I thought it was
> somewhere in LAN Network properties? TCP/IP entry?

Another way to do this is by way of right-clicking My Computer, choose
Properties, then Computer Name. There's a button that allows you to change
the workgroup name. A restart is often "required".

HTH
-pk

AJR wrote:
> "Malke" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> AJR wrote:
>>
>>> "... (a cosmetic process not affecting
>>> network behavior), >>>" ???
>> What didn't you understand about that? Workgroup names are just an
>> organizational device and do not affect networking in Windows XP. Nothing
>> prevents machines properly configured from successful file/printer sharing
>> even if they have disparate Workgroup names.
>
> May be disparate computer names.
>
> Are you saying that computers in a peer-to-peer network do not require to
> have identical workgroup names?
>
>

That's exactly what Malke is saying (correctly).

--
Lem -- MS-MVP

To the moon and back with 2K words of RAM and 36K words of ROM.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer
http://history.nasa.gov/afj/compessay.htm

AJR wrote:
> "Malke" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>>AJR wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"... (a cosmetic process not affecting
>>>network behavior), >>>" ???
>>
>>What didn't you understand about that? Workgroup names are just an
>>organizational device and do not affect networking in Windows XP. Nothing
>>prevents machines properly configured from successful file/printer sharing
>>even if they have disparate Workgroup names.
>
>
> May be disparate computer names.
>
> Are you saying that computers in a peer-to-peer network do not require to
> have identical workgroup names?

It's a Browser thing only, having the computers in the same workgroup
makes it easier to find other computers on your network. It also
eliminates a bit of the Browser complexity and makes it easier to find
and fix browser problems on your network, each workgroup has its own
Master Browser and Browse List, so having different workgroups just
makes that part of things that more complicated. Computers don't need
to be in the same workgroup to share resources but for the reasons
mentioned above it is usually better to have them in the same group.

At times it may make sense to have different workgroups, in a small
business without a real server it could make it easier to manage things
if you have different groups for different departments. For example,
Mary in accounting probably doesn't need to browse Nancy's computer in
engineering, so why have her in same workgroup and have more clutter in
the list of computers that she usually needs to browse? As mentioned
earlier, its a browser thing only, Mary and Nancy can still access
resources on each others computers.

John