Alex,
Thank you very much. Your solution is perfect.
Scott
>-----Original Message-----
>You certainly can change the port. The problem is that if
you have only 1
>public IP, you may need to change the listening port on
one of the servers,
>and that means it needs to be modified for local
connections as well.
>If your firewall supports redirecting a port on the
outside to a different
>port number internally, then just pick a high port
number - something above
>49000 or so to make sure it's not a registered port - and
you don't need to
>do anything off the firewall.
>
>Here's how, assuming the firewall works for this. Let's
assume you're going
>to use 49001 as the port on the outside that listens for
connections to the
>2nd TS.
>
>First, set up a rule for the firewall that redirects
49001 on the outside to
>port 3389 on the TS.
>
>Second, make a copy of the TSWeb page. Open it in a text
editor, and look
>for the line
> MsRdpClient.Connect
>Somewhere shortly before that line, insert a line that
says
> MsRdpClient.AdvancedSettings2.RdpPort = 49001
>and the new page will now connect to port 49001.
>
>
>
>Scott Goldman wrote:
>> I want have two W2K3 Terminal Servers that will run
behind
>> my corp. firewall. The firewall currently uses port
>> forwarding to the correct internal server. I am using
the
>> RDP Web Connection. As I understand, there is no way
for
>> the RDP Web Connection to connect to another port other
>> than 3389. If I am wrong, please let me know how to
>> change the port. If the port cannot be changed, how
can I
>> specify which server a user should connect to. There
will
>> be two seperate groups I could use to distinguish
between
>> the servers.
>
>
>.
>
|