abviously you need to intall the .net framework to have a .net application
run, but is there anyway i can change .net application into native code
application so that it can run directly without the .net framework?
it seems dosen't make any sence, but for some reason i have to do in this
way if possible.

I don't understand why you have to do it that way "if possible". If it
was an absolute requirement to not have the framework, then you should be
developing your code in C++ or something of that nature. If it is flexible,
then I would say not to try and get around the fact that you need the
framework to run your code.


--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- (E-Mail Removed)

"fairyvoice" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
newsB23FD94-F7CB-4248-83A9-(E-Mail Removed)...
> abviously you need to intall the .net framework to have a .net application
> run, but is there anyway i can change .net application into native code
> application so that it can run directly without the .net framework?
> it seems dosen't make any sence, but for some reason i have to do in this
> way if possible.

Fairyvoice,
There are utilities that will compile your .NET application into native code
and provide a runtime environment for it (without the .NET Framework
installed) but they are quite expensive.

What's the "for some reason" that you "have to do this"?

As Nicholas indicated, if you aren't going to use the .NET Framework to run
your app, then you should not be using the .NET Framework to develop it.
Peter

--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net




"fairyvoice" wrote:

> abviously you need to intall the .net framework to have a .net application
> run, but is there anyway i can change .net application into native code
> application so that it can run directly without the .net framework?
> it seems dosen't make any sence, but for some reason i have to do in this
> way if possible.

thx all of you
and what is the "utilities that will compile your .NET application into
native code ", i think i really need it

"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:

> Fairyvoice,
> There are utilities that will compile your .NET application into native code
> and provide a runtime environment for it (without the .NET Framework
> installed) but they are quite expensive.
>
> What's the "for some reason" that you "have to do this"?
>
> As Nicholas indicated, if you aren't going to use the .NET Framework to run
> your app, then you should not be using the .NET Framework to develop it.
> Peter
>
> --
> Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
> UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
> Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net
>
>
>
>
> "fairyvoice" wrote:
>
> > abviously you need to intall the .net framework to have a .net application
> > run, but is there anyway i can change .net application into native code
> > application so that it can run directly without the .net framework?
> > it seems dosen't make any sence, but for some reason i have to do in this
> > way if possible.

On Apr 25, 7:48 pm, fairyvoice <fairyvo...@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote:
> thx all of you
> and what is the "utilities that will compile your .NET application into
> native code ", i think i really need it
>
> "Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:
>
> > Fairyvoice,
> > There are utilities that will compile your .NET application into native code
> > and provide a runtime environment for it (without the .NET Framework
> > installed) but they are quite expensive.
>
> > What's the "for some reason" that you "have to do this"?
>
> > As Nicholas indicated, if you aren't going to use the .NET Framework to run
> > your app, then you should not be using the .NET Framework to develop it.
> > Peter
>
> > --
> > Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
> > UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
> > Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net
>
> > "fairyvoice" wrote:
>
> > > abviously you need to intall the .net framework to have a .net application
> > > run, but is there anyway i can change .net application into native code
> > > application so that it can run directly without the .net framework?
> > > it seems dosen't make any sence, but for some reason i have to do in this
> > > way if possible.

Here is one:

http://www.remotesoft.com/linker/

But it is $1200 to purchase.

Chris

On Apr 26, 11:48 am, Chris Dunaway <dunaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.remotesoft.com/linker/
>
> But it is $1200 to purchase.

Would you be violating the Framework redist license though?

Andy wrote:
> On Apr 26, 11:48 am, Chris Dunaway <dunaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.remotesoft.com/linker/
>>
>> But it is $1200 to purchase.
>
> Would you be violating the Framework redist license though?

Considering that the first text on that link is:

<quote>
“Remotesoft tools provide great solutions for developers for protecting
MSIL. Its new addition to the suite addresses real customer issues with
application deployment.” -- John Montgomery, director for the Developer
and Platform Evangelism Division at Microsoft Corp.</quote>

I would say no !

Arne