First of all, thank you for taking the time to check this
out.
I am unsure what part of my posts caused "but that's no
excuse for taking out your frustration on us" but I will
make an assumption (always dangerous ;=)) that it was in
my response to Eric's post.
;=) is short hand for a smile and Monty Python ( John
Cleese) do a sketch called the Dead Parrot sketch where a
customer uses a long list of descriptors to get across the
idea that a parrot is dead. I was not "taking anything
out". I was trying to be funny. Dying is easy Comedy is
hard. I never learn. Communication is trickier in ascii
so I always read things twice just to be sure that offense
was intended.
>You say you are sure that you don't
>have a virus, but what did you do that could cause you to
>not have those
>files?
I did not say that I was sure I did not have a virus. I
said that I may have a bleeding edge virus. That is a
virus at the leading edge that has not yet been seen on
any radar and therefore does not exist. Virus checkers are
inherently reactive. It is also possible that one of the
patches provided by MS has caused a problem; thus my
interest in finding fellow sufferers.
>cause you to not have those
>files?
I have the files the OS just won't display their existence.
I am using win2k with all sp's updates etc etc.
Both respondents to my post have said they are on XP with
service packs. I have to assume that the fact that I am
in a win2k NG that the OS's are so similar that for this
problem there would be no difference.
As mentioned in my original post I have turned off all
impediments to viewing in explorer. I can see all other
hidden, system and file types with known extensions. By
the way MMC is also "missing". I appreciate that you are
being thorough.
What part of the OS is used when dir is used in the ms
window? It has to be the same as explorer.
Finally I am not "copying Regedit.exe, or
Regedt32.exe". The "I challenge you" post was an
attempt to get someone to try a simple test to determine
if I was alone. What that post failed to do was ensure
that the user deselected the "hide the file" feature set.
I assumed that my target audience would have that feature
set turned off right out of the box. Agreed...Bad
assumption.
But note that these settings are irrelevant because
attribute and file extensions which the feature set uses
to hide files are not what this bug is using it is the
filename that is being used to hide the file.
I discovered the problem by trying to run regedit.
Based on the two XP users that responded, I guess I am
alone.
I cannot think of any inciting event other than love-
san/blaster or some other trojan as yet undiscovered.
But if this is a new trojan it is clever.
Cheers
>-----Original Message-----
>"wr" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:06a201c371c1$3ccd7330$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> I have posted twice and no one has responded so I will
try
>> again.
>>
>> If your machine is up to date with all the latest MS
>> patches and dribbleware.
>>
>> open note pad
>> type anything you want
>> Save as regedit.ext where ext is anything you want and
>> save it to anywhere that you can remember but the
desktop
>> is easiest cause its most visible.
>>
>> If you can see the file where you placed it good on ya.
>> You don't have the same feature I have but don't want.
>
>I can see the file. My XP SP1 system is not hiding files
named regedit.???.
>That appears to be what yours is doing, though it also
appears that in your
>frustration, you aren't stating the problem as clearly as
you might. Having
>gone back and found your previous messages, which I
missed the first time, I
>can see that you stated it more clearly the first time,
but that's no excuse
>for taking out your frustration on us.
>
>Back to your original problem. First of all, do you have
all the Explorer
>options to make things helpful turned off? Select "Show
hidden files and
>folders", and turn off "Hide extensions for known file
types" and "hide
>protected operating system files (Recommended)".
Secondly, why are you
>copying Regedit.exe, or Regedt32.exe? >
>> Save as regedit.ext where ext is the extension you used
>> the first time. You should get a message saying it
>> already exists. Whoa but you can't see it. UH HUH!
>
>I can see it just fine. Check the options I mentioned
above.
>
>Phil
>--
>Philip D. Barila Windows DDK MVP
>Seagate Technology, LLC
>(720) 684-1842
>As if I need to say it: Not speaking for Seagate.
>E-mail address is pointed at a domain squatter. Use
reply-to instead.
>
>
>.
>
|