PC Review


Reply
 
 
nick
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Jun 2006
I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
reason, or are they okay?
What's the deal?

Thanks

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
philo
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Jun 2006

"nick" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
> wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
> reason, or are they okay?
> What's the deal?
>
> Thanks
>


There is nothing wrong with a Celeron...
but in general you get a better value using an AMD cpu


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Walsh
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Jun 2006

The Celeron performance has been limited by the relatively small level 2 cache, e.g. at one time the Celeron had 128 KB L2 cache compared to the Pentium 4 512 KB L2 cache. The difference is not so pronounced these days, e.g. the Celeron in my laptop computer has 1 MB L2 cache.

nick wrote:
>
> I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
> wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
> reason, or are they okay?
> What's the deal?
>
> Thanks


--
Mike Walsh
West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.A.
 
Reply With Quote
 
paulmd@efn.org
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Jun 2006

nick wrote:
> I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
> wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
> reason, or are they okay?
> What's the deal?
>
> Thanks



Celerons have less performance, but they have 3 advantages. 1) They're
cheaper. 2) They run cooler 3) Because of bus speed limitations, some
boards will accept a faster celeron than they will a p3.


There are certian things a celeron cannot do. Like run in pairs (Except
with a custom motherboard, and there's only a handful of those).

A true p3 will beat a similar p3-based celeron. As will a p4, beat a
similar p4-based celeron.

 
Reply With Quote
 
kony
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Jun 2006
On 3 Jun 2006 06:51:43 -0700, "nick" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
>wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
>reason, or are they okay?
>What's the deal?
>
>Thanks


Linux not really an issue here, as always you are just
buying a piece of equipment and have to decide if the
performance/price is right or if you wanted to pay more for
a higher performing CPU. A Celeron is fine for most basic
tasks, even more advanced tasks these days so long as there
is no realtime performance need.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Celeron or Celeron D? dterrors@hotmail.com DIY PC 2 20th Mar 2007 06:34 AM
Celeron D Towarzysz 47 Computer Hardware 18 28th Oct 2006 02:36 PM
Re: What MB to get for a Celeron 2.8/2.93 Ghz? GuessWho DIY PC 0 26th Apr 2005 12:08 PM
Is celeron okay? ralgam Processors 19 13th Sep 2004 05:48 AM
P2B with celeron 700? tolman Asus Motherboards 1 7th Dec 2003 08:59 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 PM.