Al Dykes wrote:
> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, JK <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >
> >
> >ralgam wrote:
> >
> >> I was going to purchase a Dell inspiron 1100 or 1150, but then I
> >> started reading about the celeron processor and thought maybe the
> >> inspiron wasn't such a good idea. Here's my problem: I am not very
> >> computer savvy, so I want to purchase a computer with good technical
> >> support. But from what I've been reading, the only good technical
> >> support is from Apple. Being that I have to buy a pc clone, what do I
> >> do? (I'm only going to use the laptop for word processing, simple
> >> spreadsheets, lots of web surfing, and burning some CDs.) Any advice
> >> would be appreciated!
> >
> >Get one with an Athlon XP processor. You will get much better performance
> >than a comparably priced notebook with a Celeron processor. Apple is
> >selling many notebooks, however the prices on those aren't so low, and
> >there is much more software available for a pc than for a Mac.
> >
> >
>
> To say "purchase a laptop with an athlon" is not much help to the OP
> since the quality and support have everything to do with brand, not
> the CPU. The OP's hot button is support, and Dell generally does that
> better than most.
Others would disagree with that.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=2149&p=7
> Dell is on everyone's short list of good x86
> laptops, along with Toshiba and IBM.
>
> Apple got top marks on the recent PC Magazine support satisfaction
> survey. You can bring $1200 to the Apple store and come out with a
> very nice laptop.
Or one can spend $699(after rebates) for an Athlon XP notebook
with a 15" screen, or $599 at Walmart for one with a smaller
screen and slower cpu. $699 vs $1200 is a huge price difference.
> There are not many $1200 x86 laptops I'd want.
> An Apple will save the OP save $40/year by avoiding the expense
> of AV software.
>
> To say there is "lots more software for the PC" is questionable
Questionable? Why are you in doubt?
> , and
> irrelevant unless the OP wants to do something that MAC can't do,
> which these means business applications and some games.
Those are extremely popular software categories.
>
>
> Celeron is fine in a laptop
Fine? Why? Why settle for less performance in that price range than
you can get with an Athlon XP notebook?
> , if it's a good laptop, and you are going
> to do word processing, internet browsing, and email.
With that logic, someone should buy a $300 4 year old used notebook.
>
>
> --
> Al Dykes
> -----------
> adykes at p a n i x . c o m