PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

CAPTURING ANALOGUE VIDEO

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?bWFuZHk=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Mar 2006
I have recently bought dazzle digital video creator 90 to capture my analogue
videos it came with pinnacle studio. When I capture my video the the quality
is very poor, it has lines all through the video. Has anyone experienced the
same problem many thanks.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
decoder
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Mar 2006

"mandy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
newsBA5C95F-835C-4E57-ABE3-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I have recently bought dazzle digital video creator 90 to capture my
>analogue
> videos it came with pinnacle studio. When I capture my video the the
> quality
> is very poor, it has lines all through the video. Has anyone experienced
> the
> same problem many thanks.


This sort of device has no onboard chipset/encoding, it just
connects the analog outputs to the PC via a very basic USB
convertor.
You are totally reliant on your PC for all processing,
Analog video capture is a CPU/RAM intensive chore.
You need to have a very Hi-Spec PC for this task.
You also need to ensure your PC has USB2 ports
and an efficient FSB etc etc.
Your description of the capture results indicate this
to be the case, you will also probably note that there
is also serious audio/visual sync issues..............
Audio is relatively easy to capture, analog video is
very tricky - resulting in "frame drop", result being
the audio is out of sunc with the video.
Basically, your PC is finding it too demanding.


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?bWFuZHk=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Mar 2006
thankyou for your help. I have just bought a compaq presario sr1639uk which
does have usb2 ports but I am going to check all the other tech you mention.
thanks

"decoder" wrote:

>
> "mandy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> newsBA5C95F-835C-4E57-ABE3-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >I have recently bought dazzle digital video creator 90 to capture my
> >analogue
> > videos it came with pinnacle studio. When I capture my video the the
> > quality
> > is very poor, it has lines all through the video. Has anyone experienced
> > the
> > same problem many thanks.

>
> This sort of device has no onboard chipset/encoding, it just
> connects the analog outputs to the PC via a very basic USB
> convertor.
> You are totally reliant on your PC for all processing,
> Analog video capture is a CPU/RAM intensive chore.
> You need to have a very Hi-Spec PC for this task.
> You also need to ensure your PC has USB2 ports
> and an efficient FSB etc etc.
> Your description of the capture results indicate this
> to be the case, you will also probably note that there
> is also serious audio/visual sync issues..............
> Audio is relatively easy to capture, analog video is
> very tricky - resulting in "frame drop", result being
> the audio is out of sunc with the video.
> Basically, your PC is finding it too demanding.
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?M0tJTkdT?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Mar 2006
I have the same device and have not had any problems. My pc is Win XP, 512
ram, 3.0 Ghz intell processor. I was very dissappointed with the software
that came with it. It is very limited and will cost $$$ to activate the extra
pieces. Are you using the RCA jacks for the video or the Svideo connector?

"mandy" wrote:

> thankyou for your help. I have just bought a compaq presario sr1639uk which
> does have usb2 ports but I am going to check all the other tech you mention.
> thanks
>
> "decoder" wrote:
>
> >
> > "mandy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > newsBA5C95F-835C-4E57-ABE3-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > >I have recently bought dazzle digital video creator 90 to capture my
> > >analogue
> > > videos it came with pinnacle studio. When I capture my video the the
> > > quality
> > > is very poor, it has lines all through the video. Has anyone experienced
> > > the
> > > same problem many thanks.

> >
> > This sort of device has no onboard chipset/encoding, it just
> > connects the analog outputs to the PC via a very basic USB
> > convertor.
> > You are totally reliant on your PC for all processing,
> > Analog video capture is a CPU/RAM intensive chore.
> > You need to have a very Hi-Spec PC for this task.
> > You also need to ensure your PC has USB2 ports
> > and an efficient FSB etc etc.
> > Your description of the capture results indicate this
> > to be the case, you will also probably note that there
> > is also serious audio/visual sync issues..............
> > Audio is relatively easy to capture, analog video is
> > very tricky - resulting in "frame drop", result being
> > the audio is out of sunc with the video.
> > Basically, your PC is finding it too demanding.
> >
> >
> >

 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?bWFuZHk=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2006
I am using the RCA jacks and a analog camcorder. I have windows xp,athlon 64
processor and over a thousand ram.I am very new to this computor,I also am
very disappointed with the soft ware.

"3KINGS" wrote:

> I have the same device and have not had any problems. My pc is Win XP, 512
> ram, 3.0 Ghz intell processor. I was very dissappointed with the software
> that came with it. It is very limited and will cost $$$ to activate the extra
> pieces. Are you using the RCA jacks for the video or the Svideo connector?
>
> "mandy" wrote:
>
> > thankyou for your help. I have just bought a compaq presario sr1639uk which
> > does have usb2 ports but I am going to check all the other tech you mention.
> > thanks
> >
> > "decoder" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > "mandy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > newsBA5C95F-835C-4E57-ABE3-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > >I have recently bought dazzle digital video creator 90 to capture my
> > > >analogue
> > > > videos it came with pinnacle studio. When I capture my video the the
> > > > quality
> > > > is very poor, it has lines all through the video. Has anyone experienced
> > > > the
> > > > same problem many thanks.
> > >
> > > This sort of device has no onboard chipset/encoding, it just
> > > connects the analog outputs to the PC via a very basic USB
> > > convertor.
> > > You are totally reliant on your PC for all processing,
> > > Analog video capture is a CPU/RAM intensive chore.
> > > You need to have a very Hi-Spec PC for this task.
> > > You also need to ensure your PC has USB2 ports
> > > and an efficient FSB etc etc.
> > > Your description of the capture results indicate this
> > > to be the case, you will also probably note that there
> > > is also serious audio/visual sync issues..............
> > > Audio is relatively easy to capture, analog video is
> > > very tricky - resulting in "frame drop", result being
> > > the audio is out of sunc with the video.
> > > Basically, your PC is finding it too demanding.
> > >
> > >
> > >

 
Reply With Quote
 
decoder
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2006

"mandy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:9CE53AC6-ADB7-4698-8E66-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I am using the RCA jacks and a analog camcorder. I have windows xp,athlon
>64
> processor and over a thousand ram.I am very new to this computor,I also am
> very disappointed with the soft ware.
>


Oh dear...........
here is one of many reviews of your specific PC, though rated as value for
price,
This is the sum of this review:
"Good value AMD desktop, as long as you're not a demanding user"

And this from the body of this UK mag's review:
"but try and force feed it heavy video-editing duties and it'll slow down to
a snail's pace."
(The full review is only available within the mag, basically it is not upto
the task
that you require of it.)

http://www.pcw.co.uk/personal-comput...sario-sr1639uk

This is Compaq's spec sheet for that model, intriquingly it fails to detail
the
Front side bus speed (FSB: cache1 and cache2). Normally an efficient FSB
would be cause for an OEM to boast, I suspect they omit it as it is probably
a poor FSB?
http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/uk/en...-64386785.html

I suspect your model has a bottomline FSB, this being the usual culprit
with this type of problem. Details:
MoBo and FSB:
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/motherboard3.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_side_bus

http://www.thetechdictionary.com/term/fsb_(front_side_bus)

You require a "hardwarePVR" device to be able to capture
without glitches - these devices have their own on-board
processor/ram etc etc and are dedicated to the task and
place no stress on your PC.
This is just one example, available from a mainstrean UK
online dealer, which I suspect is also the supplier of your PC?
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/product.php?sku=979104

There are similar devices from the likes of Pinnacle
cannopus, miglia, etc.





 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?bWFuZHk=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2006
Thankyou for your help. I have browsed the suggested websites and found the
information very helpfull

"decoder" wrote:

>
> "mandy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:9CE53AC6-ADB7-4698-8E66-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >I am using the RCA jacks and a analog camcorder. I have windows xp,athlon
> >64
> > processor and over a thousand ram.I am very new to this computor,I also am
> > very disappointed with the soft ware.
> >

>
> Oh dear...........
> here is one of many reviews of your specific PC, though rated as value for
> price,
> This is the sum of this review:
> "Good value AMD desktop, as long as you're not a demanding user"
>
> And this from the body of this UK mag's review:
> "but try and force feed it heavy video-editing duties and it'll slow down to
> a snail's pace."
> (The full review is only available within the mag, basically it is not upto
> the task
> that you require of it.)
>
> http://www.pcw.co.uk/personal-comput...sario-sr1639uk
>
> This is Compaq's spec sheet for that model, intriquingly it fails to detail
> the
> Front side bus speed (FSB: cache1 and cache2). Normally an efficient FSB
> would be cause for an OEM to boast, I suspect they omit it as it is probably
> a poor FSB?
> http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/uk/en...-64386785.html
>
> I suspect your model has a bottomline FSB, this being the usual culprit
> with this type of problem. Details:
> MoBo and FSB:
> http://computer.howstuffworks.com/motherboard3.htm
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_side_bus
>
> http://www.thetechdictionary.com/term/fsb_(front_side_bus)
>
> You require a "hardwarePVR" device to be able to capture
> without glitches - these devices have their own on-board
> processor/ram etc etc and are dedicated to the task and
> place no stress on your PC.
> This is just one example, available from a mainstrean UK
> online dealer, which I suspect is also the supplier of your PC?
> http://www.pcworld.co.uk/product.php?sku=979104
>
> There are similar devices from the likes of Pinnacle
> cannopus, miglia, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Capturing Analogue (VHS) Video Rich Windows XP Video 8 10th Jun 2006 05:20 PM
Capturing from analogue Video tapes =?Utf-8?B?c3dpbmdhbG9uZw==?= Windows XP MovieMaker 3 20th Jul 2005 06:30 PM
Capturing from analogue sources using Movie Maker Griffo Fooxburr Windows XP MovieMaker 5 29th Apr 2005 11:25 PM
Buzzing noise when capturing analogue video =?Utf-8?B?Y2hhcHBlcnM1MDA=?= Windows XP MovieMaker 1 23rd Aug 2004 03:00 PM
Capturing sound from analogue cameras David Wallis Windows XP Video 0 5th Jan 2004 08:40 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:05 PM.