In <o%%Dd.8584$(E-Mail Removed)>, Fernando Quinones <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
>Hello Group,
>I have 2 windows boxes, XP and 98SE. The XP box has a 54mb wireless
>adapter and a 1gb lan adapter. The 98SE box has 2 lan adapters, 100mb
>and a 1gb. The XP is a laptop that connects to the internet with its
>wireless adapter with no problem. I want to use the second adapter (1gb)
>to connect to the 98SE 1gb adapter. This will be used to transfer large
>video files between the boxes. I want the 98SE to connect to the
>internet using the 100mb adapter and keep the 1gb adapter for the
>98SE/XP exclusive connection, but...
>Here is the problem. I cannot make the 100 mb adapter connect to the
>internet if I have the 1gb adapter installed. I have set up the 1gb
>adapter with a static address and no default gateway. The 100mb adapter
>is set up as dhcp assigned per the wireless router instructions. When I
>do this I cannot access the internet or ping any of the other boxes in
>the network. If I do the reverse, having the 1gb adapter set by the dhcp
>server, I have no problem connecting to the internet or pinging any of
>the other boxes.
>It looks to me that the 98SE box is choosing to only use the faster
>adapter. I have no desire to invest on a 1gb lan/wireless router and
>switch right now. Anyway I can force the 98SE intenet traffic on the
>100mb adapter and keep the 1gb adapter for the dedicated 98SE/XP
>connection? I would like to keep all adapters set up in the same network
>if possible. 192.168.0.XXX
Your scheme won't work because of, among other reasons, redundant routes
and insufficient exclusive IRQs for the number of bus mastering
adapters.
Just buy a 5 port gigabit switch, employ static IP addresses, and live
simply.
|