Peter wrote:
> On 01/05/2010 18:34, Sparky wrote:
>> You were good enough to reply to my post last week , I wonder if I could
>> trouble you again ?
>>
>> I posted regarding removing the carts so that I could clean the print
>> head ,
>> which is missing black. I was concerned they'd be marked as empty by the
>> printer on reinsertion ( they weren't).
>>
>> I cleaned the head , ran a test print , and all seemed OK. A day or so
>> later
>> , I tried to print again using the Plain Paper settings and the page came
>> out completely ' clean ' . No a speck of black ink...it was as though
>> there
>> was no black cart installed. If I remember correctly , you stated that
>> there
>> were 2 sets of nozzles and that's why I could print on photo paper
>> settings
>> and not plain ?
>>
>> I did another clean , and used compress air to blow through , but no
>> luck.
>> On plain paper the page is blank . I swapped for a new cart with the same
>> result ( except this time , when I put the original back in , it was
>> marked
>> as EMPTY ( very annoying ) , so I disabled the Status Monitor.
>>
>> For the past few days I've been looking for replacements , but I don't
>> really see anything that appeals. I'm reluctant to go with another
>> Canon ,
>> HP seems the most likely candidate right now , but their carts are way
>> too
>> expensive , and the only 3rd party alternatives seem to involve re
>> filling ?
>> I'd rather use a machine that has replacement 3rd party carts available.
>> That appears to be Epson or Brother ? I've had Epson before , and
>> experienced the block print head syndrome. Not keen to go down THAT
>> avenue
>> again. From what I've read , the Brother machines seem quite ' reliable '
>> even if the print quality is somewhat lacking ( I don't print photos so
>> that's really not an issue...)
>>
>> Anyway , what I'd REALLY like to know is there anything I can do to
>> repair
>> the plain paper printing on the Canon ? My guess is probably no , but
>> before
>> it becomes a donation to the recyclers , I thought I'd ask.
>>
>> Many thanks for your input.
>>
>> Sparky.
> Probably a bit late now, but I have found that applying external
> pressure to a printhead seems to be certain death. I've trashed 2 epsons
> by attempting to clear a partly blocked head by squirting/blowing
> through it
While your comments are for the most part correct with Epson heads,
Canon's technology is quite different, and sometimes the head can be
safely unblocked via compressed air.
Epson heads use piezoelectric actuators and a complex channel and pump
system which requires creating a laminated head which, if the nozzles
are blocked can cause the head to delaminate if pressurized fluids are
placed through the ink delivery system. Canon heads use thermal
expansion of the ink column to push ink out of the head, and it is more
straight forward. However, all thermal heads eventually degrade and
fail electronically, due to this continual heading and colling process.
Art
|