Tony wrote:
> measekite <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Tony wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Colinlam <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>My trusty BJC-8500 decided to give up in the middle of a print job. The
>>>>printer powers up and then beeps 4 times and the error lamp stays on.
>>>>This normally suggests lack of ink or something similar and pressing the
>>>>resume button usually gets you going until the next p[age after which
>>>>you can repeat the resume button solution until you have definitely run
>>>>out of ink. In my case with power lamp light on, 4 beeps and the error
>>>>lamp on the printer refuses to do any resuming.
>>>>
>>>>The local Ca non dealership without stripping the machine have said that
>>>>it is the main board (logic board) and that this is not available and
>>>>would take some time to procure at a cost of approx $750.00. I am not so
>>>>sure that it is the logic board and would like to know if anyone has any
>>>>other suggestions, we have tried new cartridges and heads.
>>>>
>>>>I think this printer is fantastic and the print quality using Adobe
>>>>Press Ready RIP software is excellent. I would be reluctant to scarp it
>>>>as it cost quite a bit 3 1/2 years ago and I feel there is nothing as
>>>>robust in the Canon range to meet my needs.
>>>>
>>>>If anyone has any ideas I would be grateful
>>>>Thanks
>>>>Colin
>>>>Cape Town
>>>>South Africa
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Colin
>>>Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but they may be right.
>>>The manual says it is either the cartridge (you have changed this), the
>>>carriage unit, carriage board, carriage ribbon cable or the logic board.
>>>Careful inspection *may* show a problem with the carriage ribbon cable and
>>>you
>>>could make sure all of the connectors are firmly home in their sockets but if
>>>any of these have failed it will be difficult to get parts and they will be
>>>expensive.
>>>Tony
>
>
> The following rudely inserted into my post by the troll and low life Measekite
>
> "da Tiger in da business"
>
> Yep, in "da business" which is why I know things you don't and why I am in a
> position to give professional advice (which you don't) for free; albeit not
> good news in this case.
>
> Tony
I still can't figure out wtf, "da Tiger in da business" actually
implies. Does this half wit moron really think it's better to take
advice from an inexperienced idiot like him instead of a real
knowledgeable working professional in the business like you Tony?
Is that what his poorly written drivel of a message is trying to say?
If it is then obviously you'd have to be brain dead to take his advice.
Believe Tony, he is a real professional.
Frank
|