PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Canon 9950F vs. 8400F

 
 
Norm Dresner
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Nov 2005
I'm looking to purchase a flatbed scanner to do two things
1. Upgrade from my current HP4570c which is a 2400 DPI scanner which
does only 35mm film.
2. Acquire the capability to scan at least 120 film & possibly 3-1/4 x
4-1/4 or 4x5 sheet images too

I've pretty much narrowed it down to the two scanners in the subject line.
In brief, I've been able to determine
a) the 9950F is a 4800 DPI scanner which does 35mm, 120 film, and 4x5
sheet
b) the 8400F is a 3200 DPI scanner which does 35mm and 120 film.

The available technical information on these two scanners is pretty thin and
I was hoping to find out if anyone has any other information which might
help in making an informed decision. One thing I'd love to know is how the
Dmax (dynamic range) of the two scanners compare. Another piece of missing
information is the scan-times.

Since there's quite a difference in price ($130 vs $350 at Adorama), I can't
in good conscience just flip a coin.

All information graciously accepted.

TIA
Norm

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
-
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Nov 2005
The 9950 is a significant step up from the 8400. You might want to read
Vincent Oliver's review of the 9950F at www.photo-i.co.uk for more
information.

Doug
--
Doug’s “MF Film Holder” for batch scanning "strips" of 120/220 medium format
film:
http://home.earthlink.net/~dougfishe...mainintro.html


 
Reply With Quote
 
Norm Dresner
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Nov 2005
" -" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:emmef.8801$(E-Mail Removed)...
> The 9950 is a significant step up from the 8400. You might want to read
> Vincent Oliver's review of the 9950F at www.photo-i.co.uk for more
> information.
>
> Doug
> --
> Doug’s “MF Film Holder” for batch scanning "strips" of 120/220 medium
> format film:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~dougfishe...mainintro.html
>


WOW!!! Thanks, that's quite a detailed review with tons of information. I
can't see where the 9950F would lack anything I'd want from it -- except the
performance of a dedicated film scanner ;-))

I don't suppose there's comparable information about the 8400F, is there?


Norm

 
Reply With Quote
 
john rehn
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      16th Nov 2005
Some time ago I was looking at 8400F and HP Scanjet 4890.
Both in low price. I bought a 4890.
As you can read in:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp....33888d7cd8cea8
I had some problems with it.
I am interested in comparing resolution of my scanner
and some other compatible? scanner.
I am using the "slanted edge" method to measure resolution.
When you have bought the scanner and if you are interested
in a comparison, drop me a line.
What is needed from you is just taking a scan of a sharp
edge. I can do the math.

john rehn

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon 8400F Calibration Ray Scanners 6 24th Jun 2006 01:05 AM
New Canon 8400F jiml Scanners 4 6th Jul 2005 12:01 PM
canon 9950F ian lincoln Scanners 3 11th Apr 2005 09:48 AM
Canon 9950F Alexander Mcleod Scanners 3 26th Feb 2005 03:07 AM
Vuescan & Canon 9950F Joe Cash Scanners 1 2nd Nov 2004 01:17 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 PM.