Having looked for years at memory usage when rendering, I've never seen it
actually use more than 2 GB total between RAM and swap file.... so I believe
that's a ceiling buillt into the program. If you see your total usage
getting up toward the 2 GB level when you get the message, it means you've
bumped into the ceiling.
--
website references are to
www.papajohn.org
PapaJohn
"DenizenOfAsgard" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi all,
>
> Reading the posts, I know others have had this same complaint. I get
> the following message when trying to create a movie:
>
> Cannot Complete the Save Movie Wizard.
> Your movie was not saved successfully.
>
> Windows Movie Maker cannot save the move to the specified location.
> Verify that the original source files used in your movie are still
> available, that the saving location is still available, and that there
> is enough free disk space available, and then try again.
>
> Same thing happens if I use the Wizard or the pull down. I've checked
> the Papa John site and changed my virtual memory, the inital was 576,
> changed to 2048. The max was 1152, went up by 2048 MB increments until
> I gave up at 6144 MB. Did nothing to solve the problem.
>
> Also tried to change Processor Scheduling to Background Services and
> Memory Usage to System Cache. Again did not solve problem.
>
> This movie I am trying to create is a series of 512 photographs
> (scanned in) along with 4 songs are playing. Something this simple
> shouldn't be a strain on the program at all!
>
> I have Win XP, Version 5.1 Sp2. - 512 MB memory
>
> SPECIFIC QUESTION:
>
> 1,) Why is Windows Movie Maker Failing? Yes, I've read the Papa John's
> page on that, saying it could be this or could be that
> 2.) If it is to do with Memory, How much should I increase the virtual
> memory to? Specific numbers would help. (I think over 6000 MB is
> excessive already.)
> 3.) Where is the Official Microsoft Support for this product? How do I
> get in touch with them? e.g. email address.
>
> Please excuse terse tone of this message. The tone is not directed at
> those of you out there volunteering answers, rather at Microsoft who
> has produced yet one more shoddy product.
>
> Regards,
> Joe
>