"Starlight" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:35:56 GMT, Starlight
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Not sure if this is an IE specific problem.
It's not. Better help on a newsgroup which specializes in networking
for your OS. Be sure to include information about your hardware
especially your Internet link.
You have an *intermittent* problem so it can't be User-Agent
which would only cause a *consistent* problem at a *few* sites.
Have you contacted your ISP? Asked for a different connection?
E.g. if you get information via DHCP and you use Dial-up
try using an alternate number or try hanging up and reconnecting.
Otherwise NT5 users can use (in a command window):
ipconfig /registerdns
for a similar effect. Etc.
(More...)
>>
>>In the very early morning and very late at night, I am able to access
>>any web site, including yahoo, hotmail, google, etc.. During heavy
>>traffic hours, I am unable to access sites like Yahoo, hotmail and
>>many other frequently used sites. I am, however, able to connect to
>>AIM and other sites with no problem during those hours.
>>It's as though my browser is timing out too quickly if it has to wait
>>to connect to those busy sites.
I agree but when I tried to bring the idea up the only timeout values
I was pointed at had granularity of seconds. This problem needs
timeout values with much finer granularity. Also we don't know where
the timeout is: DNS or HTTP server? Is a caching server involved?
You really need some packet traces to refine your symptom description
to pursue this tack.
>>I've done all the Ad-aware scans and Norton AV scans.
>>I was told it may be corrupt files and I should insert the Windows
>>2000 disc to see if it uploads, however I don't have that disc.
Wrong analysis IMO but why don't you have a Windows 2000 CD?
You may need it if somebody tells you to reinstall networking,
or communication drivers, for example.
>>Does this problem sound like a browser problem, a Windows problem?
Have you tried a different browser? For DNS issues it sometimes seems
that tracert does more reliable lookups than ping does which in turn
seems better able to do its lookup than IE. Perhaps a different browser
can have a similar effect? Better timeout handling for downloading
data files could be even more likely I suspect.
>>Thank you.
>>Becky
Good luck
Robert Aldwinckle
---
>
> I tried something I read here:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Make sure the following registry entry is not corrupt:
> [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet
> Settings]
> "User Agent"="Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Win32)"
>
> Note: "Win32" = Windows 98\ME
> Other versions = (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0
>
> To check your "User Agent":
> Paste the below into the Address Bar and view the output:
>
> javascript:navigator.userAgent
>
> [Example WinME output]
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> MY RESULT is Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET
> CLR 1.1.4322)
> I'm not sure how to tell if the entry is corrupt.
Looks fine for coming from IE6 running on Windows 2000 (aka NT50)