I just tried to repro this on a clean Windows XP machine with Office 2003.
Outlook did not show up initially for me either. When I had Outlook open and
went to the Indexing Options in Control Panel, then Outlook showed up.
There should not be any manual registry tweaking needed. However, see if the
following keys exist for you;
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows Desktop
Search\DS\Views\Locations\Outlook
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\Outlook\Addins\Search.OutlookToolbar
--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
http://www.msoutlook.info/
Real World Questions, Real World Answers
-----
"Pasi" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:FF13DA4A-E385-48AF-9C64-(E-Mail Removed)...
> This same thing happened me with two different combination...
>
> In m work: OL2007, XP and only IMAP-mails
> In my home: OL2003, XP and Exchange
>
> And I solved this problem in my work to change one registry key... cannot
> remember that anymore...
>
> And... in the settings menu of wds 4.0 shows only documents & settings +
> Outlook Express... OL2003 is not possible to add... and this same thing
> was
> in my work combination also...
>
> "Roady [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> What do you mean with "cannot add"?
>> Outlook doesn't show up as a location to be indexed at all?
>> Which version of Windows are you using?
>>
>> --
>> Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
>> Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
>> http://www.howto-outlook.com/
>> Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
>>
>> http://www.msoutlook.info/
>> Real World Questions, Real World Answers
>>
>> -----
>>
>> "Pasi" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:81A21C38-D46A-464E-A255-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > Hmm... for some reason I cannot add OL2003 to the windows learch 4.0.
>> >
>> > I had same problem in my other computer also (with imap client) and I
>> > found
>> > somewhere from the internet one registry fix which solved that. Now it
>> > seems
>> > very difficult to find it again...
>> >
>> > Anybody could help?
>>
>>