Full scan is taking 7 hours, would prefer to only run it once a week. Is this
possible?

Just out of interest. How big is your HD?

Please run on-line this;
http://safety.live.com/site/en-US/default.htm

Еиçеl
--

"Beginner" wrote:

> Full scan is taking 7 hours, would prefer to only run it once a week. Is this
> possible?

I started a full scan on a laptop before I left for lunch, and WD was still
scanning when I returned after an hour or so.

WD was busy somewhere in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Encarta folder.
It was taking a lot of time scanning the MDST or MDDLX files some of
which are hundereds of MB in size. I stopped the scan, and have not
tried a full scan after the engine updates, but it appears as if that WD
is very slow when it comes scanning archives.

I have got a 60GB hard drive on the laptop, and according to Diskeeper
the Free Space on the drive is 80%.

A full scan with NAV takes about 30 minutes, and a full scan with ewido
takes about 25 minutes.

"Engel" wrote:

> Just out of interest. How big is your HD?
>
> Please run on-line this;
> http://safety.live.com/site/en-US/default.htm
>
> Еиçеl
> --
>
> "Beginner" wrote:
>
> > Full scan is taking 7 hours, would prefer to only run it once a week. Is this
> > possible?

Hello Dusty,

I think you may have to work at excluding it from the scan, as an interim
measure. Tools, general settings, scroll down to advance settings, and hit
the add button.

I hope this post is helpful.
Let us know how it works ºut.
Еиçеl


"dusty" wrote:

> I started a full scan on a laptop before I left for lunch, and WD was still
> scanning when I returned after an hour or so.
>
> WD was busy somewhere in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Encarta folder.
> It was taking a lot of time scanning the MDST or MDDLX files some of
> which are hundereds of MB in size. I stopped the scan, and have not
> tried a full scan after the engine updates, but it appears as if that WD
> is very slow when it comes scanning archives.
>
> I have got a 60GB hard drive on the laptop, and according to Diskeeper
> the Free Space on the drive is 80%.
>
> A full scan with NAV takes about 30 minutes, and a full scan with ewido
> takes about 25 minutes.
>
> "Engel" wrote:
>
> > Just out of interest. How big is your HD?
> >
> > Please run on-line this;
> > http://safety.live.com/site/en-US/default.htm
> >
> > Еиçеl
> > --
> >
> > "Beginner" wrote:
> >
> > > Full scan is taking 7 hours, would prefer to only run it once a week. Is this
> > > possible?

If you read the help in Windows Defender, it recommends a daily quickscan,
and a fullscan only when something is found on the quickscan.

That's my recommendation, too. The quickscan is carefully designed--it
starts with ram contents and startup items and works back--so it is designed
to catch anything that is "live" - in memory or in startup vectors.

The fullscan is much more intensive--it looks at every file in an archive,
for example, but it isn't going to find more active infections than the
quickscan is.

"dusty" wrote:

> I started a full scan on a laptop before I left for lunch, and WD was still
> scanning when I returned after an hour or so.
>
> WD was busy somewhere in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Encarta folder.
> It was taking a lot of time scanning the MDST or MDDLX files some of
> which are hundereds of MB in size. I stopped the scan, and have not
> tried a full scan after the engine updates, but it appears as if that WD
> is very slow when it comes scanning archives.
>
> I have got a 60GB hard drive on the laptop, and according to Diskeeper
> the Free Space on the drive is 80%.
>
> A full scan with NAV takes about 30 minutes, and a full scan with ewido
> takes about 25 minutes.
>
> "Engel" wrote:
>
> > Just out of interest. How big is your HD?
> >
> > Please run on-line this;
> > http://safety.live.com/site/en-US/default.htm
> >
> > Еиçеl
> > --
> >
> > "Beginner" wrote:
> >
> > > Full scan is taking 7 hours, would prefer to only run it once a week. Is this
> > > possible?

The short answer is that you can use the Windows scheduled tasks facility to
do this yourelf, if you really want to.

However--consider only doing quickscans, and doing a fullscan only when
something is found by a quickscan--that's thre recommendation made by help in
Windows Defender.

Scans are done by \program files\windows defender\mpcmdrun.exe.

This is a command-line program--you can just run it at a cmd prompt and see
the arguments needed to get it to do the various things it can do.

If this is something you'd really like to get going, I can help you figure
out the precise syntax needed to create your own job to do that once-a-week
full scan--but I'm sticking with the quickscans mainly myself. except on
servers where I let it do a full scan in the middle of the night, on the
theory that it'll catch anything in user data space that might be worth
spotting.

"Beginner" wrote:

> Full scan is taking 7 hours, would prefer to only run it once a week. Is this
> possible?

Thanks for your help. I'll go with the scheduled quick scan, using the full
scan only when quick scan finds something.

"Bill Sanderson" wrote:

> The short answer is that you can use the Windows scheduled tasks facility to
> do this yourelf, if you really want to.
>
> However--consider only doing quickscans, and doing a fullscan only when
> something is found by a quickscan--that's thre recommendation made by help in
> Windows Defender.
>
> Scans are done by \program files\windows defender\mpcmdrun.exe.
>
> This is a command-line program--you can just run it at a cmd prompt and see
> the arguments needed to get it to do the various things it can do.
>
> If this is something you'd really like to get going, I can help you figure
> out the precise syntax needed to create your own job to do that once-a-week
> full scan--but I'm sticking with the quickscans mainly myself. except on
> servers where I let it do a full scan in the middle of the night, on the
> theory that it'll catch anything in user data space that might be worth
> spotting.
>
> "Beginner" wrote:
>
> > Full scan is taking 7 hours, would prefer to only run it once a week. Is this
> > possible?

Great--I think that's the best course. Windows Defender can be scheduled
very flexibly, but not within the program.

"Beginner" wrote:

> Thanks for your help. I'll go with the scheduled quick scan, using the full
> scan only when quick scan finds something.
>
> "Bill Sanderson" wrote:
>
> > The short answer is that you can use the Windows scheduled tasks facility to
> > do this yourelf, if you really want to.
> >
> > However--consider only doing quickscans, and doing a fullscan only when
> > something is found by a quickscan--that's thre recommendation made by help in
> > Windows Defender.
> >
> > Scans are done by \program files\windows defender\mpcmdrun.exe.
> >
> > This is a command-line program--you can just run it at a cmd prompt and see
> > the arguments needed to get it to do the various things it can do.
> >
> > If this is something you'd really like to get going, I can help you figure
> > out the precise syntax needed to create your own job to do that once-a-week
> > full scan--but I'm sticking with the quickscans mainly myself. except on
> > servers where I let it do a full scan in the middle of the night, on the
> > theory that it'll catch anything in user data space that might be worth
> > spotting.
> >
> > "Beginner" wrote:
> >
> > > Full scan is taking 7 hours, would prefer to only run it once a week. Is this
> > > possible?