I'm still not sure you can get anything really accurate. I would just take
a best guess, since your existing numbers don't support a reliable
calculated approach.
For example, for well R reading B<C, but for well T C<B: this does not
appear consistent.
Tim
"Elijah" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news

0875A61-7A2D-4934-B9AC-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Tim:
>
> Thanks for attempting my question. I took multiple readings.
>
> "Tim Williams" wrote:
>
>> I don't think you can "accurately" predict the values.
>>
>> In order to do this you'd have to have some idea of how readings from A
>> correlate with those from B and C. Since you only have 3 pairs of points
>> for each comparison (two very close togther and one much higher) you
>> don't
>> really have any sound basis for this. Did you take multiple readings or
>> just one reading for each condition (well+instrument)?
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> "Elijah" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:28440F1A-CACD-448D-BFA8-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > As shown below, I measured the gross flow of five wells (P, Q, R, S, T)
>> > with
>> > the aid of three different measuring instruments (A, B & C). How can I
>> > use
>> > excel to accurately predict A4, & A5 (The missing gross flow when I
>> > used
>> > instrument A)?
>> >
>> > A sample calculation / programming on how excel spreadsheet can be used
>> > will
>> > be appreciated. I have tried trend.
>> > Measuring Instruments
>> > "Well #" A B C
>> > P 44.9 46.4 67.3
>> > Q 50.9 52 49.5
>> > R 570 507 574.9
>> > S A4 91.4 72.5
>> > T A5 493.4 369.1
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Elijah.
>> >
>>
>>
>>