I did read your entire post, but you said you didn't have a "Tracking"
toolbar, so I was hoping you did have the Reviewing toolbar. According to
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326528, Word 2000 does in fact have the
Reviewing toolbar. You should be able to right-click on any toolbar or the
menu bar to get the toolbar menu and click on it to display it.
You should also be able to turn Track Changes off and on by double-clicking
TRK in the status bar or by pressing Ctrl+Shift+E; the current status of the
setting will be reflected in the status bar either way.
As for accepting all the changes in the document, I can't help thinking
there must be some way to do that in Word 2000. According to
http://www.shaunakelly.com/word/shar...TrackedChanges,
if you use Tools | Track Changes | Accept or Reject Changes, you can choose
to accept all the changes in the document.
If you are unable to do any of these things, perhaps the document is
protected against editing of the changes? If so, you might see whether
Unprotect Document is on the Tools menu.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org
"salgud" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:cnfqinubcdn2$.(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 18:09:45 -0500, Suzanne S. Barnhill wrote:
>
>> Display the Reviewing toolbar. Turn off Track Changes and Accept All
>> Changes
>> in Document (if Word 2000 has this option, it will be where it is in
>> later
>> versions, on the menu opened by clicking the arrow beside Accept Change).
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> As I said in my most, there is no "Turn off Track Changes". If that were
> there, I would have done so, though it still wouldn't help with removing
> the old ones.
>
> Also, as I said in my post, there is no "Accept All Changes" in this
> version. As far as being there in future version, since I don't have a
> future version, this isn't much help.
>
> May I suggest that in future replies to my, or even other's, queries, you
> read the entire post, not just the subject line? Might help you to give
> relevant replies, instead of just suggesting things that have already been
> tried unsuccessfully.