Peter D <please@.sk> wrote:
> System #1 has Outlook 2003 and is permanently connected to the
> network.System #2 has Outlook 2000 and can be connected to the
> network but is mobile (it's a laptop).
>
> I want to use either/or as aI please for e-mail, calendar, etc. I'm
> supposing that means making sure each has an identical set of
> folders/an identical PSTs. Because either could have an open PST, I
> don't think copying/overwritng a PST on one or the other is a good
> idea.
Some syncing ideas can be found here:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/sync.htm
> Also, a PDA ia available. How complicated is that to use as a 'bridge'
> between the two systems?
Not complicated at all, if the PDA is a Windows Mobile PDA. That's how I
keep my work and home mailboxes synced. Just drop the PDA in the cradle at
work, let it sync, take it home and drop in the cradle there (I have two
cradles). In the morning, back to work it goes to carry with it any updates
I made at home. If you have wireless on the PDA, you can use that to sync
without a cradle.
> It seems to me that it would require some
> complicated steps to achieve an up-to-date copy on each system. Let's
> say #1 is getting the e-mail. Then PDA is synced with #1. Now #2 is
> getting some new e-mail and PDA is synced with #2. Now PDA has to be
> re-synced with #1 to get it up-to-date.
Of course it has to be connected to each machine in turn, but I can't
imagine anyone calling that process "complicated."
--
Brian Tillman