PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Can someone explain the graphic in use of the ATI Raedon Xpress 1150card

 
 
kd833
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th May 2009
Before I added system RAM (now 2GB) to my notebook, the system RAM
count and the video frame buffer count made some sort of sense. Now I
can't figure out what XP and ATI is telling about my system RAM and
video RAM configuration. This is what I see now: XP system props says
system RAM = 1.98GB, XP display props says video adaptor size = 700MB,
ATI video display porps says video frame buffer = 16MB. Nothing seems
to add up. The card specs says it will support 256MB of video RAM.
Where is the 700MB adaptor size coming from? I can find no ultility
that wil tell me how much video RAM is "in use" or tell me how much
system RAM is being used by the video card other than believing the
16MBs has been set aside for the video card. Is there something like
that out there? Please point me to it. TIA
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Benjamin Gawert
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th May 2009
* kd833:
> Before I added system RAM (now 2GB) to my notebook, the system RAM
> count and the video frame buffer count made some sort of sense. Now I
> can't figure out what XP and ATI is telling about my system RAM and
> video RAM configuration. This is what I see now: XP system props says
> system RAM = 1.98GB, XP display props says video adaptor size = 700MB,
> ATI video display porps says video frame buffer = 16MB. Nothing seems
> to add up. The card specs says it will support 256MB of video RAM.
> Where is the 700MB adaptor size coming from? I can find no ultility
> that wil tell me how much video RAM is "in use" or tell me how much
> system RAM is being used by the video card other than believing the
> 16MBs has been set aside for the video card. Is there something like
> that out there? Please point me to it. TIA


Your Radeon Xpress 1150 is a shared memory solution that has no own
graphics memory. It uses a part of the system memory for graphics, the
amount it uses is dynamically assigned. The 1150 can allocate up to
256MB as graphics memory. The ATI control panel shows you how much
currently is in use (16MB). Windowsxp shows you the maximum amount
useable for graphics (graphics memory + size available for texture
swapping into standard RAM) which is 700MB.

All these numbers are meaningless as the Xpress 1150 is very slow and
hardly useable for demanding 3D applications or games, and for 2D
application (where it is fast enough) very little memory is actually
used. So I wouldn't worry about that.



Benjamin
 
Reply With Quote
 
kd833
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th May 2009
On May 4, 6:44*am, Benjamin Gawert <bgaw...@gmx.de> wrote:
> * kd833:
>
> > Before I added system RAM (now 2GB) to my notebook, the system RAM
> > count and the video frame buffer count made some sort of sense. Now I
> > can't figure out what XP and ATI is telling about my system RAM and
> > video RAM configuration. This is what I see now: XP system props says
> > system RAM = 1.98GB, XP display props says video adaptor size = 700MB,
> > ATI video display porps says video frame buffer = 16MB. Nothing seems
> > to add up. The card specs says it will support 256MB of video RAM.
> > Where is the 700MB adaptor size coming from? I can find no ultility
> > that wil tell me how much video RAM is "in use" or tell me how much
> > system RAM is being used by the video card other than believing the
> > 16MBs has been set aside for the video card. Is there something like
> > that out there? Please point me to it. TIA

>
> Your Radeon Xpress 1150 is a shared memory solution that has no own
> graphics memory. It uses a part of the system memory for graphics, the
> amount it uses is dynamically assigned. The 1150 can allocate up to
> 256MB as graphics memory. The ATI control panel shows you how much
> currently is in use (16MB). Windowsxp shows you the maximum amount
> useable for graphics (graphics memory + size available for texture
> swapping into standard RAM) which is 700MB.
>
> All these numbers are meaningless as the Xpress 1150 is very slow and
> hardly useable for demanding 3D applications or games, and for 2D
> application (where it is fast enough) very little memory is actually
> used. So I wouldn't worry about that.
>
> Benjamin


Thanks. So the 700MB is not really stolen from the system. Windows is
just indicating that 700MB could be available for graphics if needed.
You are correct about the 2D/3D uses. This is just a business PC and
not use for gaming.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATI Raedon 1600 Colin Windows Vista General Discussion 7 8th Mar 2007 11:38 PM
Raedon 9600 50 Hz in 80x25, was 70 Hz! help! replicator Video Cards 0 8th Feb 2005 01:24 PM
ati raedon not installing Windows XP Hardware 13 20th Feb 2004 10:49 PM
AIW Raedon 9000 and Avid Xpress DV Steve Tom ATI Video Cards 0 5th Jan 2004 02:28 AM
FX5900 v Raedon 9600 Pro johnny8977 DIY PC 32 31st Dec 2003 02:43 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:20 PM.