PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Can SATA be used with PATA

 
 
Mark
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Dec 2003
Hi

Running 2 hds (prim pata) 2 CDs (sec pata)
Just added a SATA hd and now my cds wont work getting
Windows cannot start this hardware device because its configuration
information (in the registry) is incomplete or damaged. (Code 19) ????

Can you run pata and sata together ?


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Courseyauto
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Dec 2003
what motherboard?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mark
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Dec 2003
Sorry its a a7n8x
"Courseyauto" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> what motherboard?



 
Reply With Quote
 
Mark
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Dec 2003
Also ive tried uninstalling the cd roms (and the sec channel) and letting
windows redected it... no luck
"Mark" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:u1YHb.41193$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi
>
> Running 2 hds (prim pata) 2 CDs (sec pata)
> Just added a SATA hd and now my cds wont work getting
> Windows cannot start this hardware device because its configuration
> information (in the registry) is incomplete or damaged. (Code 19) ????
>
> Can you run pata and sata together ?
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Ron
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Dec 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tre...k_dec_lgsc.asp

Mark - several months ago, I used to see a steady stream of people who had
lost their optical drives unexpectedly. Invariably it was due to a quirk
associated with one or more CD-burning app's. Evidently those app's modify
a small [but significant] entry in the registry.

In any case, to answer your orig Q; yes. You can certainly use 4 IDE
devices with another 2 on the Serial controller. But, before tinkering with
the registry, I would like to toss out an idea: What about a little
experimentation with the boot sequence in the BIOS? Since you didn't say
otherwise, I'm assuming that the PATA PRI/MSTR is your boot drive...but
perhaps the boot sequence has been altered since you added the Serial drive.
Or perhaps the boot sequence is unchanged...but now that you have a Serial
drive installed, it makes a difference that was previously ignored(?)

Have a snoop around in there and see if you can effect the desired
performance. Meanwhile someone else will probably toss in some additional
feedback, and we'll go from there.

Ron


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: SATA host adapter or PATA-to-SATA converter? Wayne Wastier Windows XP Hardware 0 7th Jul 2008 07:52 AM
Re: SATA host adapter or PATA-to-SATA converter? Bill in Co. Windows XP Hardware 2 30th Jun 2008 08:50 PM
Re: SATA host adapter or PATA-to-SATA converter? M.I.5¾ Windows XP Hardware 0 30th Jun 2008 10:32 AM
Re: SATA host adapter or PATA-to-SATA converter? DL Windows XP Hardware 1 29th Jun 2008 09:10 PM
SATA vs PATA HD's Vic Windows XP General 3 15th Dec 2006 06:26 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 AM.