Alex: The splitter app solution behaves exactly like my solution. What I am
trying to emulate is the Windows Explorer way of doing it. My app and yours
resizes both controls on the fly. The Windows explorer method I beleive is
more elegant since you don't get all the flickering. In windows explorer,
only a dashed line is draged accress the control. When the dashed line is
dropped, then and only then does the rezise occur. But as I mentioned in my
orriginal post, I have yet to find a control that can be draged and that has
a Z-Order that places it above a ListView or a TreeView Control.
Thanks
Richard
"Alex Dybenko" wrote:
> no, this one i mean, for access 97, but you can easy convert it to 2002
> http://maug.pointltd.com/access/Quer...st.asp?dlid=11
>
> --
> Alex Dybenko (MVP)
> http://Alex.Dybenko.com
> http://www.PointLtd.com
>
>
> "Esperluette" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:24AF7EB5-8EE1-4926-BE70-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Looks like splitter is a .net framework control I am using access 2002 but
> > thanks for the info.
> >
> > "Alex Dybenko" wrote:
> >
> >> Try to look at splitter solution at MAUG downloads here:
> >>
> >> http://maug.pointltd.com/access
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alex Dybenko (MVP)
> >> http://Alex.Dybenko.com
> >> http://www.PointLtd.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Esperluette" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> news:5F33E4AF-1410-44F8-8EE9-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> >I am trying to simulate Windows Explorer's resizing of the Treeview
> >> >control
> >> > and the adjacent ListView control.
> >> > Here is what I did : I have a Rectangle control sitting on a Form
> >> > inbetween
> >> > as TreeView and a ListView control. In the MouseMoove event I
> >> > reposition
> >> > the
> >> > Rectangle control(if the left button is pressed) so that it follows the
> >> > mouse's X axis. In the MouseUp event I resize the TreeView and the
> >> > ListView
> >> > control. The problem is that the Rectangle control's Z-Order places it
> >> > behind
> >> > the ListView or the TreeView control.
> >> > Any solution or work-around?
> >> > Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>