I would like to know if it possible to have my name showing to email
recipients, without showing my email address. I am using Outlook 2003.

Ryven wrote:

> I would like to know if it possible to have my name showing to email
> recipients, without showing my email address. I am using Outlook 2003.

It is illegal not to include a valid e-mail address according to
CAN-SPAM law.

This a NOT a pro-spam newsgroup.

Your display name does not have to include your email address but the
message will contain your email address. Trying to send without an address
is likely to get the message dropped as spam.

--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com

Outlook Tips by email:
mailto:dailytips-subscribe-(E-Mail Removed)

EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
mailto:EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-(E-Mail Removed)

Let's Really Fix Outlook 2010
http://forums.slipstick.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34

"Ryven" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:9256D545-66D9-44AB-BC03-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I would like to know if it possible to have my name showing to email
> recipients, without showing my email address. I am using Outlook 2003.

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:04:01 -0700, Ryven wrote:

> I would like to know if it possible to have my name showing to email
> recipients, without showing my email address. I am using Outlook 2003.

The requirements of the SMTP protocol are to include a "MAIL FROM:" email
address in the transaction. While this need not be a valid email address, an
email address with an invalid domain will likely be marked as spam, and a
valid-but-forged email address could well invoke the ire of the proper user
of the forged email address.

In short, if your intent is to send a valid email, it is best to use a valid
email address which is properly yours to use.

--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum