PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

How can I get Outlook2003 rules to "move" emails properly - such that lower/later rules wont encounter the same emails?

 
 
ship
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Oct 2006
[Outlook2003 on local PC running WinXP Pro]

Hi

I am a bit confused about how Outlook's rules work on emails.
They seem to be extreme counter-intuitive.

1. I presume that they are executed in the order presented
i.e. the top ones first, yes?

2. If one of the higher rules, "MOVES" an email to a directory
it seem that rules lower down the list can ALSO do the same thing!

3.
It seems that a previous rule in the list has to "move" AND "delete"
a rule to stop lower/later rules from finding it.


And the trouble with *deleting* stuff is that it's very alarming to see
valid emails
appearing in my trash before I've actually read them (even if they are
safely
moved (i.e. copied) elsewhere!)

e.g. a key problem for me is that as webmaster, I get lots of valid
official
message email (such as receipts) "from" one of our members of staff
which I need to move to the relevant directory...
....but then I also get REAL emails from the same guy and I need
those to be moved to a *different* location (to remove them from all
the
1000s of email/day of dross!) - but only if his emails are NOT any of
the
various official/receipt type emails!

So... how can I move real emails from him, that haven't met any of
the conditions filtered for in any of the rules above... WITHOUT
having unread valid-looking stuff appear in my trash ?!

Confused


Ship
Shiperton Henethe

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Diane Poremsky [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Oct 2006
Use Stop processing on the first rule to prevent later rules from applying.
--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide)
Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/

Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:
EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-(E-Mail Removed)


"ship" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> [Outlook2003 on local PC running WinXP Pro]
>
> Hi
>
> I am a bit confused about how Outlook's rules work on emails.
> They seem to be extreme counter-intuitive.
>
> 1. I presume that they are executed in the order presented
> i.e. the top ones first, yes?
>
> 2. If one of the higher rules, "MOVES" an email to a directory
> it seem that rules lower down the list can ALSO do the same thing!
>
> 3.
> It seems that a previous rule in the list has to "move" AND "delete"
> a rule to stop lower/later rules from finding it.
>
>
> And the trouble with *deleting* stuff is that it's very alarming to see
> valid emails
> appearing in my trash before I've actually read them (even if they are
> safely
> moved (i.e. copied) elsewhere!)
>
> e.g. a key problem for me is that as webmaster, I get lots of valid
> official
> message email (such as receipts) "from" one of our members of staff
> which I need to move to the relevant directory...
> ...but then I also get REAL emails from the same guy and I need
> those to be moved to a *different* location (to remove them from all
> the
> 1000s of email/day of dross!) - but only if his emails are NOT any of
> the
> various official/receipt type emails!
>
> So... how can I move real emails from him, that haven't met any of
> the conditions filtered for in any of the rules above... WITHOUT
> having unread valid-looking stuff appear in my trash ?!
>
> Confused
>
>
> Ship
> Shiperton Henethe
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
ship
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      6th Oct 2006
BRILLIANT!
Thanks

Ship

Diane Poremsky [MVP] wrote:
> Use Stop processing on the first rule to prevent later rules from applying.
> --
> Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
> Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
> Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide)
> Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
> Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/
>
> Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
> Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
> Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:
> EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-(E-Mail Removed)
>
>
> "ship" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > [Outlook2003 on local PC running WinXP Pro]
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I am a bit confused about how Outlook's rules work on emails.
> > They seem to be extreme counter-intuitive.
> >
> > 1. I presume that they are executed in the order presented
> > i.e. the top ones first, yes?
> >
> > 2. If one of the higher rules, "MOVES" an email to a directory
> > it seem that rules lower down the list can ALSO do the same thing!
> >
> > 3.
> > It seems that a previous rule in the list has to "move" AND "delete"
> > a rule to stop lower/later rules from finding it.
> >
> >
> > And the trouble with *deleting* stuff is that it's very alarming to see
> > valid emails
> > appearing in my trash before I've actually read them (even if they are
> > safely
> > moved (i.e. copied) elsewhere!)
> >
> > e.g. a key problem for me is that as webmaster, I get lots of valid
> > official
> > message email (such as receipts) "from" one of our members of staff
> > which I need to move to the relevant directory...
> > ...but then I also get REAL emails from the same guy and I need
> > those to be moved to a *different* location (to remove them from all
> > the
> > 1000s of email/day of dross!) - but only if his emails are NOT any of
> > the
> > various official/receipt type emails!
> >
> > So... how can I move real emails from him, that haven't met any of
> > the conditions filtered for in any of the rules above... WITHOUT
> > having unread valid-looking stuff appear in my trash ?!
> >
> > Confused
> >
> >
> > Ship
> > Shiperton Henethe
> >


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rules Fail to Move Messages without using "Run Rules Now" bebisone@gmail.com Microsoft Outlook Discussion 8 12th Oct 2007 06:47 AM
How can I get Outlook2003 rules to "move" emails properly - such that lower/later rules wont encounter the same emails? ship Microsoft Outlook 2 6th Oct 2006 11:55 AM
Rules to Move Emails, Copy My Emails =?Utf-8?B?SnVtcGluZ01hdHRGbGFzaA==?= Microsoft Outlook Discussion 0 15th Jun 2006 11:16 AM
Outlook 2000 Rules Wizard's "Import Rules" changed all named folders to "specified" Microsoft News Microsoft Outlook 0 11th Feb 2004 02:01 AM
Rule Wizard: "Rules In Error" - Won't forward emails Jenna Martin Microsoft Outlook 0 8th Jan 2004 10:37 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 PM.