I would like to try my hand at slipstreaming an install disk of WinXP
SP2 plus selected updates in order to cut down the overall install time.

Is there a website where I can select the updates that I want to install
and disregard those that I do not, such as IE7?

Thanks
Ken K

Ken wrote:
> I would like to try my hand at slipstreaming an install disk of
> WinXP SP2 plus selected updates in order to cut down the overall
> install time.
> Is there a website where I can select the updates that I want to
> install and disregard those that I do not, such as IE7?


Ken,

Slipstreaming is a very simplistic process. Made even more so with tools
like NLite and the Windows Update Downloader.

However - I think in your case - I would patiently wait the 6-10 days and
download the full Windows XP SP3 and integrate that into your Windows XP SP1
or above CD. It will make your life simpler and make for a just as
effective jaunt into the world of slipstreaming.

If you must do more - take the terms I have given you and do a Google
search. Throw in this web page: http://unattended.msfn.org/ for good
measure.

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

On Apr 23, 1:43*pm, Ken <nore...@charter.net> wrote:
> I would like to try my hand at slipstreaming an install disk of WinXP
> SP2 plus selected updates in order to cut down the overall install time.
>
> Is there a website where I can select the updates that I want to install
> and disregard those that I do not, such as IE7?
>
> Thanks
> Ken K

Wait until April 29, 2008. Service Pack 3 should be officially
released.

BTW: IE7 and WMP 11 are supposed to not be part of the SP3.

smlunatick wrote:
> On Apr 23, 1:43 pm, Ken <nore...@charter.net> wrote:
>> I would like to try my hand at slipstreaming an install disk of WinXP
>> SP2 plus selected updates in order to cut down the overall install time.
>>
>> Is there a website where I can select the updates that I want to install
>> and disregard those that I do not, such as IE7?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ken K
>
> Wait until April 29, 2008. Service Pack 3 should be officially
> released.
>
> BTW: IE7 and WMP 11 are supposed to not be part of the SP3.

The big question is if the Windows Genuine Advantage Tool will be
included or not.

Alias

Ken wrote:
> I would like to try my hand at slipstreaming an install disk of WinXP
> SP2 plus selected updates in order to cut down the overall install time.
>
> Is there a website where I can select the updates that I want to install
> and disregard those that I do not, such as IE7?
>
> Thanks
> Ken K

I tried it just for the fun. Nlite works pretty good but it has a few
bugs I reported to the author.
My first issue was downloading the updates from Microsoft. I did all
105 or so of them. But some are not available any more, probably
superseded by a later patch.
There are sites that say then have both a program and patches, but I've
seen some and they include a few more KB#### patches that never got sent
either as required or optional. I've loaded everything but the update
to RDP. I hate the new RDP. It didn't take me more than a few
hours to download the software.

Next Nlite suggest sorting pathces by effective date. But some dates
are 2008/01/31 and some are 01/31/2008. So the whole thing does not
sort right. I tried a few things and all in all the load was missing
some major files. Now granted I unchecked the Media Center load, and I
have a feeling not loading Media Center on a Media Center system is a NO
NO. But I had no warning. Still the whole concept of sorting the
patches in some order and not the order they should be scares me.
Scares me that file X might overwrite file Y and I get the wrong one
installed.

I posted this in a thread one day and the best responses were to just
Slipstream SP2 (or now SP3) and let Windows update the others.

But to answer your question, Nlite seems to do a pretty good job. I
have since looked at my patch update history and developed a list of the
patches in the order that the standard windows updates put them in. I
think if I were to try rebuilding another CD, I'd put the patches in
that order rather than date or KB# order. And leave MCE installed of
course.

If you have a spare drive like I do, its a simple thing to test and play
with. And it is somewhat educational too. Necessary? Well I can't
say its necessary, but we all have our reasons. Go for it. Have fun
if you can do it on a spare drive.

I think I'm more secure with doing a virgin load, update all the
patches, load a few critical apps, like firefox, configure a few
preferences, la de dah, and then image the drive with Acronis TI.
Then use that to reload. I think this is a much better idea all in
all. I get some tools / apps / config issues and a virgin system.

updates to bundled programs like IE, WMP, Movie Maker, etc. are never
included in a service pack. They are serviced by their own update programs.

"smlunatick" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:b808cfdc-11d0-4263-bd0b-(E-Mail Removed)...
On Apr 23, 1:43 pm, Ken <nore...@charter.net> wrote:
> I would like to try my hand at slipstreaming an install disk of WinXP
> SP2 plus selected updates in order to cut down the overall install time.
>
> Is there a website where I can select the updates that I want to install
> and disregard those that I do not, such as IE7?
>
> Thanks
> Ken K

Wait until April 29, 2008. Service Pack 3 should be officially
released.

BTW: IE7 and WMP 11 are supposed to not be part of the SP3.

If you download the lates sp from MS administrative updates then you will
have all previous sp updates included

"Ken" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:OyKPj.51$(E-Mail Removed)...
>I would like to try my hand at slipstreaming an install disk of WinXP SP2
>plus selected updates in order to cut down the overall install time.
>
> Is there a website where I can select the updates that I want to install
> and disregard those that I do not, such as IE7?
>
> Thanks
> Ken K

Big Al wrote:
> Ken wrote:
>> I would like to try my hand at slipstreaming an install disk of WinXP
>> SP2 plus selected updates in order to cut down the overall install time.
>>
>> Is there a website where I can select the updates that I want to
>> install and disregard those that I do not, such as IE7?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ken K
>
> I tried it just for the fun. Nlite works pretty good but it has a few
> bugs I reported to the author.
> My first issue was downloading the updates from Microsoft. I did all
> 105 or so of them. But some are not available any more, probably
> superseded by a later patch.
> There are sites that say then have both a program and patches, but I've
> seen some and they include a few more KB#### patches that never got sent
> either as required or optional. I've loaded everything but the update
> to RDP. I hate the new RDP. It didn't take me more than a few
> hours to download the software.
>
> Next Nlite suggest sorting pathces by effective date. But some dates
> are 2008/01/31 and some are 01/31/2008. So the whole thing does not
> sort right. I tried a few things and all in all the load was missing
> some major files. Now granted I unchecked the Media Center load, and I
> have a feeling not loading Media Center on a Media Center system is a NO
> NO. But I had no warning. Still the whole concept of sorting the
> patches in some order and not the order they should be scares me. Scares
> me that file X might overwrite file Y and I get the wrong one installed.
>
> I posted this in a thread one day and the best responses were to just
> Slipstream SP2 (or now SP3) and let Windows update the others.
>
> But to answer your question, Nlite seems to do a pretty good job. I
> have since looked at my patch update history and developed a list of the
> patches in the order that the standard windows updates put them in. I
> think if I were to try rebuilding another CD, I'd put the patches in
> that order rather than date or KB# order. And leave MCE installed of
> course.
>
> If you have a spare drive like I do, its a simple thing to test and play
> with. And it is somewhat educational too. Necessary? Well I can't
> say its necessary, but we all have our reasons. Go for it. Have fun
> if you can do it on a spare drive.
>
> I think I'm more secure with doing a virgin load, update all the
> patches, load a few critical apps, like firefox, configure a few
> preferences, la de dah, and then image the drive with Acronis TI.
> Then use that to reload. I think this is a much better idea all in
> all. I get some tools / apps / config issues and a virgin system.
>

I concur with your approach. I have had good luck with Acronis TI and
had planned on creating an image after I had installed all of the
updates, then create another one after I have installed all of my
programs (I have lots of hdd space).

Thanks
KK

--
Kenneth Krone, M.D.
San Luis Diagnostic Center
1100 Monterey, Suite 210
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

o 805 542 9700
c 805 458 9040
f 800 635 5718

The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. It is
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you receive the email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to anyone or make copies. Federal regulation, 42 CFR, Part 2,
prohibits further disclosure.

Ken wrote:
> Big Al wrote:
>> Ken wrote:
>>> I would like to try my hand at slipstreaming an install disk of WinXP
>>> SP2 plus selected updates in order to cut down the overall install time.
>>>
>>> Is there a website where I can select the updates that I want to
>>> install and disregard those that I do not, such as IE7?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Ken K
>>
>> I tried it just for the fun. Nlite works pretty good but it has a
>> few bugs I reported to the author.
>> My first issue was downloading the updates from Microsoft. I did all
>> 105 or so of them. But some are not available any more, probably
>> superseded by a later patch.
>> There are sites that say then have both a program and patches, but
>> I've seen some and they include a few more KB#### patches that never
>> got sent either as required or optional. I've loaded everything but
>> the update to RDP. I hate the new RDP. It didn't take me more
>> than a few hours to download the software.
>>
>> Next Nlite suggest sorting pathces by effective date. But some dates
>> are 2008/01/31 and some are 01/31/2008. So the whole thing does not
>> sort right. I tried a few things and all in all the load was
>> missing some major files. Now granted I unchecked the Media Center
>> load, and I have a feeling not loading Media Center on a Media Center
>> system is a NO NO. But I had no warning. Still the whole concept
>> of sorting the patches in some order and not the order they should be
>> scares me. Scares me that file X might overwrite file Y and I get the
>> wrong one installed.
>>
>> I posted this in a thread one day and the best responses were to just
>> Slipstream SP2 (or now SP3) and let Windows update the others.
>>
>> But to answer your question, Nlite seems to do a pretty good job. I
>> have since looked at my patch update history and developed a list of
>> the patches in the order that the standard windows updates put them
>> in. I think if I were to try rebuilding another CD, I'd put the
>> patches in that order rather than date or KB# order. And leave MCE
>> installed of course.
>>
>> If you have a spare drive like I do, its a simple thing to test and
>> play with. And it is somewhat educational too. Necessary? Well I
>> can't say its necessary, but we all have our reasons. Go for it.
>> Have fun if you can do it on a spare drive.
>>
>> I think I'm more secure with doing a virgin load, update all the
>> patches, load a few critical apps, like firefox, configure a few
>> preferences, la de dah, and then image the drive with Acronis TI.
>> Then use that to reload. I think this is a much better idea all in
>> all. I get some tools / apps / config issues and a virgin system.
>>
>
> I concur with your approach. I have had good luck with Acronis TI and
> had planned on creating an image after I had installed all of the
> updates, then create another one after I have installed all of my
> programs (I have lots of hdd space).
>
> Thanks
> KK
>

I know its a bit of time, but you know the KISS principal. Some days
there is no better way. Do it right, and do it once.