On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:56:37 -0400, Peptic_Sheriff
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

If you're asking in regard to your web page question it won't matter.
Vista uses BETTER fonts. Even if they can be transferred (I don't see
why not) I haven't tried.

Yes, fonts are usually universal.

--
Dustin Harper
(E-Mail Removed)
http://www.vistarip.com

--
"Peptic_Sheriff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>

"Peptic_Sheriff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>



Yes, but it won't make any difference to your 'problem' and you are just
going to get older versions of the fonts (losing newer minor updates or
major ones like TrueType families > OpenType).

In your vain attempts to change the way a badly coded website displays in
IE7, you are messing with things you do not understand.

There are different ways to define which fonts and what size are to be used
in websites, and different browsers interpret these instructions differently
if they are not positively defined.

ss.

Thanks for the info

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:56:34 -0000, "Synapse Syndrome"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>"Peptic_Sheriff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>
>
>
>Yes, but it won't make any difference to your 'problem' and you are just
>going to get older versions of the fonts (losing newer minor updates or
>major ones like TrueType families > OpenType).
>
>In your vain attempts to change the way a badly coded website displays in
>IE7, you are messing with things you do not understand.
>
>There are different ways to define which fonts and what size are to be used
>in websites, and different browsers interpret these instructions differently
>if they are not positively defined.
>
>ss.

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:56:34 -0000, "Synapse Syndrome"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>"Peptic_Sheriff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>
>
>
>Yes, but it won't make any difference to your 'problem' and you are just
>going to get older versions of the fonts (losing newer minor updates or
>major ones like TrueType families > OpenType).
>
>In your vain attempts to change the way a badly coded website displays in
>IE7, you are messing with things you do not understand.
>
>There are different ways to define which fonts and what size are to be used
>in websites, and different browsers interpret these instructions differently
>if they are not positively defined.
>
>ss.

Anybody know how good IE7 is in supporting CCS on web sites?

"Peptic_Sheriff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Thanks for the info
>

You're welcome.

ss.

"Adam Albright" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:56:34 -0000, "Synapse Syndrome"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>"Peptic_Sheriff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Yes, but it won't make any difference to your 'problem' and you are just
>>going to get older versions of the fonts (losing newer minor updates or
>>major ones like TrueType families > OpenType).
>>
>>In your vain attempts to change the way a badly coded website displays in
>>IE7, you are messing with things you do not understand.
>>
>>There are different ways to define which fonts and what size are to be
>>used
>>in websites, and different browsers interpret these instructions
>>differently
>>if they are not positively defined.
>>
>>ss.
>
> Anybody know how good IE7 is in supporting CCS on web sites?
>


It's a lot better than IE6, but still not as compliant as Firefox.

ss.

"Adam Albright" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:56:34 -0000, "Synapse Syndrome"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>"Peptic_Sheriff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Yes, but it won't make any difference to your 'problem' and you are just
>>going to get older versions of the fonts (losing newer minor updates or
>>major ones like TrueType families > OpenType).
>>
>>In your vain attempts to change the way a badly coded website displays in
>>IE7, you are messing with things you do not understand.
>>
>>There are different ways to define which fonts and what size are to be
>>used
>>in websites, and different browsers interpret these instructions
>>differently
>>if they are not positively defined.
>>
>>ss.
>
> Anybody know how good IE7 is in supporting CCS on web sites?

CSS, BTW..

ss.

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:20:44 -0000, "Synapse Syndrome"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>"Adam Albright" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:56:34 -0000, "Synapse Syndrome"
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>"Peptic_Sheriff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, but it won't make any difference to your 'problem' and you are just
>>>going to get older versions of the fonts (losing newer minor updates or
>>>major ones like TrueType families > OpenType).
>>>
>>>In your vain attempts to change the way a badly coded website displays in
>>>IE7, you are messing with things you do not understand.
>>>
>>>There are different ways to define which fonts and what size are to be
>>>used
>>>in websites, and different browsers interpret these instructions
>>>differently
>>>if they are not positively defined.
>>>
>>>ss.
>>
>> Anybody know how good IE7 is in supporting CCS on web sites?
>
>CSS, BTW..
>
>ss.

Oops, yep, you're right, thanks. Was hoping it would be better.