I would like send emails with attachments, but have the cc people only get
the base message and no attachments.

Thank you in advance!

Not possible.

--
John Blessing

http://www.LbeHelpdesk.com - Help Desk software priced to suit all
businesses
http://www.room-booking-software.com - Schedule rooms & equipment bookings
for your meeting/class over the web.
http://www.lbetoolbox.com - Remove Duplicates from MS Outlook, find/replace,
send newsletters

"Drawyah" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:84DF1904-0E04-4104-850F-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I would like send emails with attachments, but have the cc people only get
> the base message and no attachments.
>
> Thank you in advance!

No, you'll need to send 2 messages for that.

--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more

http://www.msoutlook.info/
Real World Questions, Real World Answers

-----

"Drawyah" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:84DF1904-0E04-4104-850F-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I would like send emails with attachments, but have the cc people only get
> the base message and no attachments.
>
> Thank you in advance!

In the original paper world when multiple copies were typed on a manual
typewriter using carbon paper between the copies "cc" stood for "carbon copy"
( yes "Websters Secretarial Handbook" does also call these carbon copies
"courtesy copies" ) and the recipient so designated got a carbon copy text of
the original message but normal office practice was NOT to send the
enclosures (now referred to as attachments), unless speciffically requested
by the sender, only the original "To" recipient got the full package since
there was only one original. If, in the MS Office world this is not the case
then what is the functional difference between "To" & "Cc" in MS Office? I
understand the distinction for "Bcc" has still been maintained to ensure some
protection for NOT displaying ALL recipients names. I have been searching
the online help and tutorials for the answer for quite a while before I
started exploring the forums.

"Roady [MVP]" wrote:

> No, you'll need to send 2 messages for that.
>
> --
> Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
> Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
> http://www.howto-outlook.com/
> Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
>
> http://www.msoutlook.info/
> Real World Questions, Real World Answers
>
> -----
>
> "Drawyah" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:84DF1904-0E04-4104-850F-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I would like send emails with attachments, but have the cc people only get
> > the base message and no attachments.
> >
> > Thank you in advance!
>
>

Grant B. <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> In the original paper world when multiple copies were typed on a
> manual typewriter using carbon paper between the copies "cc" stood
> for "carbon copy" ( yes "Websters Secretarial Handbook" does also
> call these carbon copies "courtesy copies" ) and the recipient so
> designated got a carbon copy text of the original message but normal
> office practice was NOT to send the enclosures (now referred to as
> attachments), unless speciffically requested by the sender, only the
> original "To" recipient got the full package since there was only one
> original. If, in the MS Office world this is not the case then what
> is the functional difference between "To" & "Cc" in MS Office? I
> understand the distinction for "Bcc" has still been maintained to
> ensure some protection for NOT displaying ALL recipients names. I
> have been searching the online help and tutorials for the answer for
> quite a while before I started exploring the forums.

You're welcome to create your SMTP client whose behavior is as you've
described. SMTP protocols are well documented. I suspect you could sell
enough of them to profit from the effort.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

No, it's the SMTP protocol that dictates that 2 separate messages has to be
created for this. Not "MS Office" as stated by Grant B.

The CC is often used as "for informational purposes only." Which means no
reply or any other action is expected from you. The fact that the digital
world offers a solution of "there is only one original to be send so CCed
people will not get it" is a side effect which is positive for some and
negative for others.

--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more

http://www.msoutlook.info/
Real World Questions, Real World Answers

-----

"Brian Tillman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Grant B. <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> In the original paper world when multiple copies were typed on a
>> manual typewriter using carbon paper between the copies "cc" stood
>> for "carbon copy" ( yes "Websters Secretarial Handbook" does also
>> call these carbon copies "courtesy copies" ) and the recipient so
>> designated got a carbon copy text of the original message but normal
>> office practice was NOT to send the enclosures (now referred to as
>> attachments), unless speciffically requested by the sender, only the
>> original "To" recipient got the full package since there was only one
>> original. If, in the MS Office world this is not the case then what
>> is the functional difference between "To" & "Cc" in MS Office? I
>> understand the distinction for "Bcc" has still been maintained to
>> ensure some protection for NOT displaying ALL recipients names. I
>> have been searching the online help and tutorials for the answer for
>> quite a while before I started exploring the forums.
>
> You're welcome to create your SMTP client whose behavior is as you've
> described. SMTP protocols are well documented. I suspect you could sell
> enough of them to profit from the effort.
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]