>> Considering how awkward is is to negotiate the ATI site, sometimes
>> it's easier to ask.
>
>Have you been there lately? It is slightly different since it changed
>to ati.amd.com, but to tell the truth I never had a problem with it,
>even before. It took me about 20 seconds to find what he was looking
>for. Anyway, the point I was trying to make was that he could have
>found what he was looking for in less time than it took him to ask here,
>then wait for a reply. He said he asked ATI tech and they never
>responded, so I assumed (maybe wrongly) that he was already at the site
>once. To paraphrase somebody else "If you give a man a fish, he has
>food for a meal. If you teach him to fish, he has food for a lifetime."
In most instances, this would be very good thinking.
>Do you see where I'm going with this?
Unfortunately, as with most things in life, things are a bit more
complicated.
If the OP follows your advice and goes here:
http://tinyurl.com/ycz4x5
then downloads the latest driver for the AIW 9600, he/she would find
they could not get 1680 X 1050 resolution, a native resolution for a
22" WS display. At least I couldn't with the RTM version of Vista, and
I jumped through a _bunch_ of hoops trying.
Now here's the interesting part, The previous ATI driver, 8.33.0.0,
dated 12/16/06, perfectly displays 1680 X 1050 on the exact same
system.
So the correct answer to the OP's question is:
Yes the AIW 9600 can support a WS monitor (at least a 22"), but only
with the previous driver.
Again, I _strongly_ agree with your above analogy but there are
exceptions to every cliche'. <g>