I have a .NET executable written in C# (A).
From my own .NET executable also written in C# (B), I need to call some
function in this executable (A). Both executables are at the same computer.
If the other executable (A) was a DLL it would be very simple.
Beside the .NET Remoting, is there another way to do it?

--
Regards
Sharon G.

Hello Sharon,

If you want EXE (A) to call EXE (B) then you will need to
use .NET Remoting.

If you convert the EXE (B) to a DLL then EXE (A) will
need to reference the DLL or make a late binding to make
the call to the DLL.

Thanks,
>-----Original Message-----
>I have a .NET executable written in C# (A).
>From my own .NET executable also written in C# (B), I
need to call some
>function in this executable (A). Both executables are at
the same computer.
>If the other executable (A) was a DLL it would be very
simple.
>Beside the .NET Remoting, is there another way to do it?
>
>--
>Regards
>Sharon G.
>.
>

Hi,


Well the process B could use a TCP port , or a named piped (not natively
supported .net IIRC)

If B is a windows program you may send a windows message.


What kind of info you need to transfer?

cheers,

--
Ignacio Machin,
ignacio.machin AT dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department Of Transportation


"Sharon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2DF9C7B3-8BDF-43DA-AA16-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I have a .NET executable written in C# (A).
> From my own .NET executable also written in C# (B), I need to call some
> function in this executable (A). Both executables are at the same
> computer.
> If the other executable (A) was a DLL it would be very simple.
> Beside the .NET Remoting, is there another way to do it?
>
> --
> Regards
> Sharon G.

That is what I thought; I’ll guess I’ll use the remoting.
I just want to call to process B that makes motion control action, and this
function should be blocked and unblocked functions.

------
Thanks
Sharon G.