If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I have
never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800 is the way it
should be played.

JK

9600 pro should work just as good.


On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:51:13 GMT, "John Hall" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I have
>never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800 is the way it
>should be played.
>
>JK
>

Plays badass, on my 9700np

-
We Live For The One We Die For The One stood up at show-n-tell, in
(E-Mail Removed), and said:

> 9600 pro should work just as good.
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:51:13 GMT, "John Hall" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>> If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I
>> have never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800
>> is the way it should be played.
>>
>> JK

--
Strontium

"It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every
now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit

"John Hall" wrote
> If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I have
> never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800 is the way
it
> should be played.



Hi,

I made a similar post myself. I was really impressed with the demo. It was
the first bit of proper FPS-first person gaming I done since I built my new
AMD rig using a Sapphire Atlantis 9800, really was impressed!

I get the feeling that this game could be kickass in a LAN set-up if you and
your mates could play co-op vs the computer (Germans).

Anyway I been out the FPS gaming loop for 3 years or so. Maybe I am too
easily impressed but I give my thumbs up for the ATI cards, I have been a
long term nVidia user. . .

--
Wayne ][

Barton (AQXEA) XP2500+ @ 2.2GHz (10x220) - 1.75vCore
CoolerMaster Aero 7 Lite - 3,200rpm
ABIT NF7-S (v2.0 - BIOS#14)
512MB Dual TwiSTER PC3500 @ DDR440 (8,3,3,2.0 - 2.8v)
Sapphire Atlantis 9800 - 3.3ns Samsung
240GB (2x120GB) WD-SE SATA RAID-0 (16k Stripe)
Antec SX630II Mini-Tower Case Inc 300w PSU
WinXP-PRO-SP1
Cat 3.7 - DX9.0b

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:51:13 GMT, "John Hall" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I have
>never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800 is the way it
>should be played.
>
Except it uses the Quake 3 engine, so it runs smoothly on practically
anything.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble (E-Mail Removed) & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

Yeah i mean what the hell - does it use ANY dx9 features?


<spamtrap@localhost> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:51:13 GMT, "John Hall" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
> >If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I have
> >never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800 is the way
it
> >should be played.
> >
> Except it uses the Quake 3 engine, so it runs smoothly on practically
> anything.
> --
> Andrew. To email unscramble (E-Mail Removed) & remove spamtrap.
> Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
> Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:31:02 +0100, "gappy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Yeah i mean what the hell - does it use ANY dx9 features?
>
It might do, but as it is Q3 running in OpenGL it ain't going to be
Direct 3D.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble (E-Mail Removed) & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

I tried it. My system is a P4 at 3.4 Mhz with 512 Mb PC3700 and a 9800 Pro
on a 172T LCD monitor. Game play is good, not anything better than MOAA,
but better than BF-1942 for single play. I found it to be a little jerky
with unexplained lags/pauses in some segments. Opponents sometimes seemed
to materialize from nowhere. I enjoyed it but it gave me a headache after
about 30 minutes. Ghost Recon is still the best single player FPS out
there, and CS is the undisputed champion if you want to test your skill on
line.


"John Hall" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:5s4eb.160521$(E-Mail Removed)...
> If you haven't downloaded this and played it on your 9800, do it. I have
> never seen anything as good on my PC. For DirectX 9, the 9800 is the way
it
> should be played.
>
> JK
>
>

> 9600 pro should work just as good.

No, allmost as good... ;-)

"Frank Weston" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:JbKdnX4cYpHo5eSiU-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I tried it. My system is a P4 at 3.4 Mhz with 512 Mb PC3700 and a 9800
Pro
> on a 172T LCD monitor. Game play is good, not anything better than MOAA,
> but better than BF-1942 for single play. I found it to be a little jerky
> with unexplained lags/pauses in some segments. Opponents sometimes seemed
> to materialize from nowhere. I enjoyed it but it gave me a headache after
> about 30 minutes. Ghost Recon is still the best single player FPS out
> there, and CS is the undisputed champion if you want to test your skill on
> line.
>

???
Gameplay is good, much improved over MOHAA. No jerkyness or lag at any time.
Opponents AI very good. Demo not that long though. Done in about 30 minutes.

Martin.
Barton XP3200+, 9700pro, 512 mb RAM.