Hi Gerry,
You asked for suggestions. Be careful what you wish for ... :-)
Start over and redesign your database application by the rules.
You have designed your database as though an Excel spreadsheet were the
template for a database. It isn't. In Excel it's common to just add
another column when you have repeating data of the same type: Price1,
Price2, Pricen. That's a clear indication that you need another table for
Price.
Your application has more than one entity. Here I'm guessing what you might
call them but try Prospect/Client (one table), Contact, Address, Project,
Quote/Order (one table). There will likely be more tables before you're
done. In relational database design, you strive to properly identify the
entity type in play and then create a table for each entity. Then you can
create relationships between your representations of those entities that
mimic the relationships of the real-world entities.
Access has a steep learning curve but, once well begun, you can do some
really useful work. For starters, read a beginner book or two on Access.
Lurk these newsgroups; microsoft.public.access.tablesdesign and
microsoft.public.access.gettingstarted are a couple of good ones to start.
Every copy of Access comes with Northwinds.mdb, a good example for beginning
to learn. Open it up, try it out, look under the hood.
HTH
--
-Larry-
--
"Gerry" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:09704CA6-64C6-4D20-9C91-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi
>
> I have a simple database that provides quotations for work to be
undertaken.
> There is only one table containing all the fields. On the nain form I
have
> four fields: Price, Price2,Price3 and Price4 to allow for up to four
> different pieces of work on one quote. I want to be able to total the
costs
> of each of the four elements and display as a total figure on the form.
>
> I have used Total=Sum([Price]+[Price2]+[Price3]+[Price4]). This works,
> however, it totals the cost of ALL the figures in all the records and I
just
> want the total for each individual record to display on the form of that
> record.
>
> many thanks for any suggestions.
|