Let me first apologize in case this question has been asked elsewhere or if
it is just a dumb question.

If I purchase a license for XP Professional via my VL agreement, does that
not include one CAL for Windows 2000/2003 Server (basic file/print services)?

Thanks in advance,
Chris

Nope, you still need to purchase a CAL.

hth
DDS W 2k MVP MCSE

"Chris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:614DBAB8-8BDA-47FC-A6B2-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Let me first apologize in case this question has been asked elsewhere or
> if
> it is just a dumb question.
>
> If I purchase a license for XP Professional via my VL agreement, does that
> not include one CAL for Windows 2000/2003 Server (basic file/print
> services)?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Chris

That is ludicrus. Why else would I buy a Windows XP Professional machine if
I'm not going to connect it to a Windows Server? Why doesn't it include it in
the cost of the license of XP?

I guess that also means that if I have a license for Outlook 2003 and an
Exchange 2003 server that I will also need an additional CAL for that?

"Danny Sanders" wrote:

> Nope, you still need to purchase a CAL.
>
> hth
> DDS W 2k MVP MCSE
>
> "Chris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:614DBAB8-8BDA-47FC-A6B2-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Let me first apologize in case this question has been asked elsewhere or
> > if
> > it is just a dumb question.
> >
> > If I purchase a license for XP Professional via my VL agreement, does that
> > not include one CAL for Windows 2000/2003 Server (basic file/print
> > services)?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Chris
>
>
>

> That is ludicrus.

Take that up with MS. I don't make the rules I just answered your question.
I don't work for MS.

Call them (800) 426-9400, Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M.-5:30 P.M. Pacific
Time to speak directly to a Microsoft licensing specialist.


Why else would I buy a Windows XP Professional machine if
> I'm not going to connect it to a Windows Server?

Hmm.. lets see, maybe as a standalone computer?


Why doesn't it include it in
> the cost of the license of XP?

Because *everybody* does not use Windows XP professional to connect to a
server? Why would I pay for something I don't need?

> I guess that also means that if I have a license for Outlook 2003 and an
> Exchange 2003 server that I will also need an additional CAL for that?

Yes you will need an Exchange CAL.


Look no one is forcing you to use MS products. If you don't like their rules
you are totally free to go with Linux or something else.



DDS

"Chris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:7120FECD-3F09-436B-8DE7-(E-Mail Removed)...
> That is ludicrus. Why else would I buy a Windows XP Professional machine
> if
> I'm not going to connect it to a Windows Server? Why doesn't it include it
> in
> the cost of the license of XP?
>
> I guess that also means that if I have a license for Outlook 2003 and an
> Exchange 2003 server that I will also need an additional CAL for that?
>
> "Danny Sanders" wrote:
>
>> Nope, you still need to purchase a CAL.
>>
>> hth
>> DDS W 2k MVP MCSE
>>
>> "Chris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:614DBAB8-8BDA-47FC-A6B2-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > Let me first apologize in case this question has been asked elsewhere
>> > or
>> > if
>> > it is just a dumb question.
>> >
>> > If I purchase a license for XP Professional via my VL agreement, does
>> > that
>> > not include one CAL for Windows 2000/2003 Server (basic file/print
>> > services)?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> > Chris
>>
>>
>>

If it's a small network (<=10 users) you can use a desktop-version of
Windows as the 'server' (with the exception of XP Home which isn't so
suitable) and in that case you don't need CALs.

Should perhaps add that you can't run Exchange that way, though.

Danny,

Don't take it personally, dude. I'm just venting. Didn't mean to upset you.

Chris

"Danny Sanders" wrote:

> > That is ludicrus.
>
> Take that up with MS. I don't make the rules I just answered your question.
> I don't work for MS.
>
> Call them (800) 426-9400, Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M.-5:30 P.M. Pacific
> Time to speak directly to a Microsoft licensing specialist.
>
>
> Why else would I buy a Windows XP Professional machine if
> > I'm not going to connect it to a Windows Server?
>
> Hmm.. lets see, maybe as a standalone computer?
>
>
> Why doesn't it include it in
> > the cost of the license of XP?
>
> Because *everybody* does not use Windows XP professional to connect to a
> server? Why would I pay for something I don't need?
>
> > I guess that also means that if I have a license for Outlook 2003 and an
> > Exchange 2003 server that I will also need an additional CAL for that?
>
> Yes you will need an Exchange CAL.
>
>
> Look no one is forcing you to use MS products. If you don't like their rules
> you are totally free to go with Linux or something else.
>
>
>
> DDS
>
> "Chris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:7120FECD-3F09-436B-8DE7-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > That is ludicrus. Why else would I buy a Windows XP Professional machine
> > if
> > I'm not going to connect it to a Windows Server? Why doesn't it include it
> > in
> > the cost of the license of XP?
> >
> > I guess that also means that if I have a license for Outlook 2003 and an
> > Exchange 2003 server that I will also need an additional CAL for that?
> >
> > "Danny Sanders" wrote:
> >
> >> Nope, you still need to purchase a CAL.
> >>
> >> hth
> >> DDS W 2k MVP MCSE
> >>
> >> "Chris" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> news:614DBAB8-8BDA-47FC-A6B2-(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > Let me first apologize in case this question has been asked elsewhere
> >> > or
> >> > if
> >> > it is just a dumb question.
> >> >
> >> > If I purchase a license for XP Professional via my VL agreement, does
> >> > that
> >> > not include one CAL for Windows 2000/2003 Server (basic file/print
> >> > services)?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance,
> >> > Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>