"RMac" <(E-Mail Removed).(donotspam)> wrote in message
news:805CF678-B4C7-4B7B-A843-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I don't disagree with your comment concerning our choice of DHCP servers.
> What other options did you have in mind? We have one site that uses
> Cisco's
> CNR. Not particularly resiliant, but it gets the job done.
>
> I think our application is not the typical enterprise. Each user has
> their
> own scope (and virtual network). I would love to hear what you have say.
I'm afraid I may be getting a little out of my depth <blush>. Seriously, I'm
not sure what your needs are, nor why the configuration you're using is in
place/what it's used for. Try posting with more detail in a networking group
to see what you can see.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mac
> --
> We are not Borg...
>
>
> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>
>>
>> "RMac" <(E-Mail Removed).(donotspam)> wrote in message
>> news:37A6685D-6AE4-4377-A9F9-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Thank you for your response. Provisioning. We have Call Center
>> > personel
>> > (non techs) who access and build scopes for our interenet users. The
>> > MS
>> > interface is easy for them to use.
>>
>> OK. I find this an odd choice still, as there are so many alternatives,
>> but
>> that's no matter. Re CALs for users, I doubt you need them, but you
>> should
>> call Microsoft licensing for this, to make sure you get the correct
>> answer
>> from the source.
>> >
>> > Remotely access, that is to provision the DHCP server. Our call center
>> > and
>> > geographically displaced from the servers. We use Remote Desktop to
>> > connect
>> > and provision the DHCP scopes.
>> >
>> > I'm presuming that Terminal Services are used by Remote Desktop?
>>
>> No. Remote Desktop is for admin only use (which it sounds like you're
>> using)
>> and TS is something else entirely - it's RD but for users to use/share as
>> a
>> big fat desktop, essentially. You're fine without it.
>>
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > mac
>> >
>> > --
>> > We are not Borg...
>> >
>> >
>> > "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> In news:7878D4CF-5C45-4B08-9975-(E-Mail Removed),
>> >> RMac <(E-Mail Removed).(donotspam)> typed:
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> >
>> >> > I am wanting to purchase and install window 2003 server software.
>> >> > However, we have a unique setup were we only use the server for DHCP
>> >> > services (for aprox. 500 machines). We remotely access the server
>> >> > from our home offices using Remote Desktop. The users never (they
>> >> > can't even see the server) the services on the server, except for
>> >> > DHCP requests. Do I still need a CAL for each user?
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers,
>> >> >
>> >> > Mac
>> >>
>> >> My first question is, why do you want to buy & install Win2003 just
>> >> for
>> >> DHCP? That sounds like an incredible waste of money/resources.
>> >> My second question is, what does "remotely access the server from our
>> >> home
>> >> offices" mean - Terminal Services?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
|
Similar Threads
