Using Outlook 2003. I tried to change outlook to cache mode and when I
restarted outlook it apparently found an ost file that was already there. I
guess someone had put this person in cache mode before and then changed it
back. When outlook opened there were old emails in the file that had been
recently read but were not showing as not having been read. I took it out of
cache mode. Is it ok to delete the ost and oab files and start fresh but
putting outlook back in cache mode?

Thanks,
--
Dan D.

Yes.

"Dan D." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news91986A3-180C-4C6C-8E90-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Using Outlook 2003. I tried to change outlook to cache mode and when I
> restarted outlook it apparently found an ost file that was already there.
> I
> guess someone had put this person in cache mode before and then changed it
> back. When outlook opened there were old emails in the file that had been
> recently read but were not showing as not having been read. I took it out
> of
> cache mode. Is it ok to delete the ost and oab files and start fresh but
> putting outlook back in cache mode?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Dan D.

Thanks.
--
Dan D.


"neo [mvp outlook]" wrote:

> Yes.
>
> "Dan D." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news91986A3-180C-4C6C-8E90-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Using Outlook 2003. I tried to change outlook to cache mode and when I
> > restarted outlook it apparently found an ost file that was already there.
> > I
> > guess someone had put this person in cache mode before and then changed it
> > back. When outlook opened there were old emails in the file that had been
> > recently read but were not showing as not having been read. I took it out
> > of
> > cache mode. Is it ok to delete the ost and oab files and start fresh but
> > putting outlook back in cache mode?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Dan D.
>
>
>