What is the C# equivalent to the VB.Net looping structure:

Protected rbl As RadioButtonList

Dim li As ListItem
For Each li In rbl.Items

Next li

Believe it or not, it's called "foreach".

"John Grandy" <johnagrandy-at-yahoo-dot-com> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> What is the C# equivalent to the VB.Net looping structure:
>
> Protected rbl As RadioButtonList
>
> Dim li As ListItem
> For Each li In rbl.Items
>
> Next li
>

C# has foreach as well:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...us/csref/html/
vclrfTheForeachStatement.asp

Any class that implements IEnumerable will support foreach.

--
Ajay Kalra [MVP - VC++]
(E-Mail Removed)


"John Grandy" <johnagrandy-at-yahoo-dot-com> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> What is the C# equivalent to the VB.Net looping structure:
>
> Protected rbl As RadioButtonList
>
> Dim li As ListItem
> For Each li In rbl.Items
>
> Next li
>
>

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:38:47 -0500, Ajay Kalra wrote:

> Any class that implements IEnumerable will support foreach.

Actually any class with a public GetEnumerator() method that returns an
IEnumerator implementation will support foreach. The class doesn't need to
implement IEnumerable, just have the GetEnumerator() method. There are
times when this subtle difference can be important.
--
Tom Porterfield

RTFM

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:19:38 -0800, "John Grandy"
<johnagrandy-at-yahoo-dot-com> wrote:

>What is the C# equivalent to the VB.Net looping structure:
>
>Protected rbl As RadioButtonList
>
>Dim li As ListItem
>For Each li In rbl.Items
>
>Next li
>

Thank you for your very positive statement regarding profesionalism,
camaraderie, the planet, and those who live on it.

"QWERTY" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> RTFM
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:19:38 -0800, "John Grandy"
> <johnagrandy-at-yahoo-dot-com> wrote:
>
>>What is the C# equivalent to the VB.Net looping structure:
>>
>>Protected rbl As RadioButtonList
>>
>>Dim li As ListItem
>>For Each li In rbl.Items
>>
>>Next li
>>
>

"QWERTY" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> RTFM

He can't look up the statements of one language in the manual of another
language. See the problem? There is no specific "FM" that answers his
question.

Actually there is.

Language Equivalents
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...quivalents.asp

Sam


On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:50:59 -0500, "Michael A. Covington"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>"QWERTY" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> RTFM
>
>He can't look up the statements of one language in the manual of another
>language. See the problem? There is no specific "FM" that answers his
>question.
>

B-Line is now hiring one Washington D.C. area VB.NET
developer for WinForms + WebServices position.
Seaking mid to senior level developer. For
information or to apply e-mail resume to
sam_blinex_com.

Yes yes yes I could have looked it up. But what I never understood about
the "RTFM" people is that it takes them longer to type and submit a "RTFM"
answer than it takes them to read the question in the first place, so if
they are so annoyed by their time being wasted by "obvious questions" then
why do they invest the additional time to respond?

"Samuel R. Neff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> Actually there is.
>
> Language Equivalents
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...quivalents.asp
>
> Sam
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:50:59 -0500, "Michael A. Covington"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>
>>"QWERTY" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> RTFM
>>
>>He can't look up the statements of one language in the manual of another
>>language. See the problem? There is no specific "FM" that answers his
>>question.
>>
>
> B-Line is now hiring one Washington D.C. area VB.NET
> developer for WinForms + WebServices position.
> Seaking mid to senior level developer. For
> information or to apply e-mail resume to
> sam_blinex_com.

Because once you get a "how do you do for-each in c#" then you get
"how do you do x" and "how do you do y" and on and on and on.

Looking up answers instead of just posting questions is very
beneficial in that you not only get the answer to your question but
almost always end up learning something else unrelated.

Sam


On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:32:42 -0800, "John Grandy"
<johnagrandy-at-yahoo-dot-com> wrote:

>Yes yes yes I could have looked it up. But what I never understood about
>the "RTFM" people is that it takes them longer to type and submit a "RTFM"
>answer than it takes them to read the question in the first place, so if
>they are so annoyed by their time being wasted by "obvious questions" then
>why do they invest the additional time to respond?
>
>"Samuel R. Neff" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>> Actually there is.
>>
>> Language Equivalents
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...quivalents.asp
>>
>> Sam

B-Line is now hiring one Washington D.C. area VB.NET
developer for WinForms + WebServices position.
Seaking mid to senior level developer. For
information or to apply e-mail resume to
sam_blinex_com.