PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Buying Reviews: Professional or Standard Visual Studio 2008????

 
 
Logician
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Feb 2008
I have been using Visual1.1 C# .NET for a few years but due to buying
code from rentacoder.com I have to now upgrade to run imported code
(which I have purchased).

I would appreciate any views held by developers in this NG of the
worth of Visual Studio 2008 Professional and the same software but the
Standard version.

Also, does anyone have any concept of the worth of 3.0 over 3.5 and if
3.5 will have incompatibilities with 3.0, ie would code written under
3.0 fail in 3.5?

I only use C# and not VB.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Michael Nemtsev [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Feb 2008
Hello Logician,

L> I would appreciate any views held by developers in this NG of the
L> worth of Visual Studio 2008 Professional and the same software but
L> the Standard version.

see the product comparision
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/de-de/vs2008/products/bb980920(en-us).aspx

L> Also, does anyone have any concept of the worth of 3.0 over 3.5 and
L> if 3.5 will have incompatibilities with 3.0, ie would code written
L> under 3.0 fail in 3.5?

yep, it fails. u need .net 3.5 to compile and run .net 3.5 projects

..NET is compatible from the top to the bottom

---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [.NET/C# MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo



 
Reply With Quote
 
Logician
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Feb 2008
On Feb 23, 12:39*pm, Michael Nemtsev [MVP] <nemt...@msn.com> wrote:
> Hello Logician,
>
> L> I would appreciate any views held by developers in this NG of the
> L> worth of Visual Studio 2008 Professional and the same software but
> L> the Standard version.
>
> see the product comparisionhttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/de-de/vs2008/products/bb980920(en-us).aspx
>
> L> Also, does anyone have any concept of the worth of 3.0 over 3.5 and
> L> if 3.5 will have incompatibilities with 3.0, ie would code written
> L> under 3.0 fail in 3.5?
>
> yep, it fails. u need .net 3.5 to compile and run .net 3.5 projects
>
> .NET is compatible from the top to the bottom
>
> ---
> WBR,
> Michael *Nemtsev [.NET/C# MVP] :: blog:http://spaces.live.com/laflour
>
> "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
> miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo


Looks to me like Server Explorer is the only real difference and maybe
Mobile later.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Visual Studio 2008 Professional Edition Web Form Controls John Crews Microsoft ASP .NET 16 23rd May 2009 06:53 PM
Visual Studio 2008 Professional Edition Web Form Controls John Crews Microsoft ASP .NET 0 19th May 2009 01:27 AM
Visual Studio 2008 Professional Microsoft Newsserver Microsoft ASP .NET 2 3rd Mar 2008 01:32 PM
Visual Studio 2005 Standard vs. Professional John Hall Microsoft Dot NET 0 21st Mar 2006 05:24 PM
Upgrade to Standard or Professional Visual Studio 2005? Jon Gabel Microsoft Dot NET 0 16th Nov 2005 06:15 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:38 PM.