I've only one piece of advice. Spend enough money to get what you need.
Go to your boss and ask for more if you have to. You don't want to be
screwing around with hardware in the months to come, especially if it's
off-site. Buy what you need now.
John C. Frickson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been tasked to build a small co-located datacenter. Budget is
> limited. My needs are approximately:
>
> 1 Windows machine, average speed (2.8 - 3.3 GHz) 1-2GB RAM, 72GB disk.
> 1 machine for web server (Linux/Apache) 1GB, 72GB+
> 1 machine for database (Linux/MySQL) 2GB, 72GB
> 1 machine for net services (Email, DNS, POP, IMAP) 1GB, 32GB
> 1 machine for development & QA (2 would be nice, but...)
>
> Everything must be completely remote manageable. Should have
> redundant hot-swap power & fans, RAID. Dual NICs for at least two
> of the machines.
>
> At this point, I don't think I need any dual processors or dual core
> CPUs, but I'd like to keep that option for future expansion.
>
> I've looked at Dell and Compaq rackmount systems. New systems
> configured as specified (without O/S) would run about $2,500 to
> $3,500, which blows the budget. It looks like I could save around
> 30% at the Dell outlet, which would bring me within budget, but
> without a whole lot left over for switch/router, O/S, etc.
>
> I have seen some good prices for IBM BladeCenter systems, which
> might be an option. Future expansion would probably be a bit less
> expensive than adding racks. Dell blade systems from the outlet
> might also be a possibility.
>
> I've considered putting the dev, QA, and Email/DNS servers on a
> single machine running under Xen or Virtual Server.
>
> Any thoughts, questions, advice?
>
> Thanks,
> jcf
|
Similar Threads
